Essential Strategies for Effective AI Governance in Healthcare

New AMA Guidance on AI Adoption and Governance Is Essential for CMOs

With the brisk pace of artificial intelligence tool expansion, it is imperative for Chief Marketing Officers (CMOs) and other healthcare leaders to implement policies for AI tool adoption and governance.

Key Takeaways

The American Medical Association (AMA) has identified eight foundational elements for responsible AI adoption:

  • Establishing accountability and structure for executives
  • Forming a working group to detail priorities, processes, and policies
  • Assessing current policies for AI adoption
  • Developing new policies for AI adoption
  • Defining project intake, vendor evaluation, and assessment processes
  • Updating standard planning and implementation processes
  • Establishing an oversight and monitoring process
  • Supporting AI organizational readiness

AI governance has become a hot topic in healthcare discussions, particularly within the HealthLeaders AI in Clinical Care Mastermind program. Participants emphasize the necessity for health systems to adopt a comprehensive approach to AI governance and to initiate these efforts as early as possible.

The Importance of AI Governance

The rapid pace of AI tool adoption in healthcare underscores the need for robust governance and adoption policies. As technology evolves quicker than implementation capabilities, establishing an appropriate governance structure is crucial. According to a leading expert, “Technology is moving very, very quickly. It’s moving much faster than we’re able to actually implement these tools.”

How Health Systems are Managing AI Governance

Several health systems are taking proactive steps in establishing AI governance structures:

Providence

Providence Health System employs a methodical approach to AI governance, ensuring alignment with its mission, values, and organizational priorities. Their governance structure includes:

  • An AI guardrails workgroup led by the chief data officer
  • An information protection committee led by the chief information security officer
  • A data ethics council led by the chief ethicist

According to the former chief clinical officer, this comprehensive approach prioritizes patient safety, privacy, and the ethical use of AI.

Community Health Network

Community Health Network has established an executive steering committee to identify and prioritize AI tools and use cases. The committee is composed of various leaders, including the director of AI and data governance, the CMO, and technical staff:

“You need to have the governance in place to make sure that you understand all of the tools that are being used, how the tools are being used, the intended outcome of usage, and how you mitigate bias,” advised the executive vice president and chief transformation officer.

UMass Memorial Health

UMass Memorial Health has formed an AI governance committee dedicated to the adoption and implementation of AI tools in clinical care. This committee aims to establish policies and processes for the various AI tools being requested within the organization:

“We are establishing a policy and a process for working through the different kinds of AI tools that are being requested at the organization,” stated the chief quality officer.

The committee includes clinicians, IT staff, legal team members, risk management personnel, ethicists, and health equity advocates, all focused on safely implementing AI tools.

In conclusion, as the healthcare landscape continues to evolve with the rapid integration of AI technologies, establishing clear governance and adoption policies is essential for CMOs and other leaders to ensure that AI tools enhance patient care while maintaining safety and ethical standards.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...