Essential Strategies for Effective AI Governance in Healthcare

New AMA Guidance on AI Adoption and Governance Is Essential for CMOs

With the brisk pace of artificial intelligence tool expansion, it is imperative for Chief Marketing Officers (CMOs) and other healthcare leaders to implement policies for AI tool adoption and governance.

Key Takeaways

The American Medical Association (AMA) has identified eight foundational elements for responsible AI adoption:

  • Establishing accountability and structure for executives
  • Forming a working group to detail priorities, processes, and policies
  • Assessing current policies for AI adoption
  • Developing new policies for AI adoption
  • Defining project intake, vendor evaluation, and assessment processes
  • Updating standard planning and implementation processes
  • Establishing an oversight and monitoring process
  • Supporting AI organizational readiness

AI governance has become a hot topic in healthcare discussions, particularly within the HealthLeaders AI in Clinical Care Mastermind program. Participants emphasize the necessity for health systems to adopt a comprehensive approach to AI governance and to initiate these efforts as early as possible.

The Importance of AI Governance

The rapid pace of AI tool adoption in healthcare underscores the need for robust governance and adoption policies. As technology evolves quicker than implementation capabilities, establishing an appropriate governance structure is crucial. According to a leading expert, “Technology is moving very, very quickly. It’s moving much faster than we’re able to actually implement these tools.”

How Health Systems are Managing AI Governance

Several health systems are taking proactive steps in establishing AI governance structures:

Providence

Providence Health System employs a methodical approach to AI governance, ensuring alignment with its mission, values, and organizational priorities. Their governance structure includes:

  • An AI guardrails workgroup led by the chief data officer
  • An information protection committee led by the chief information security officer
  • A data ethics council led by the chief ethicist

According to the former chief clinical officer, this comprehensive approach prioritizes patient safety, privacy, and the ethical use of AI.

Community Health Network

Community Health Network has established an executive steering committee to identify and prioritize AI tools and use cases. The committee is composed of various leaders, including the director of AI and data governance, the CMO, and technical staff:

“You need to have the governance in place to make sure that you understand all of the tools that are being used, how the tools are being used, the intended outcome of usage, and how you mitigate bias,” advised the executive vice president and chief transformation officer.

UMass Memorial Health

UMass Memorial Health has formed an AI governance committee dedicated to the adoption and implementation of AI tools in clinical care. This committee aims to establish policies and processes for the various AI tools being requested within the organization:

“We are establishing a policy and a process for working through the different kinds of AI tools that are being requested at the organization,” stated the chief quality officer.

The committee includes clinicians, IT staff, legal team members, risk management personnel, ethicists, and health equity advocates, all focused on safely implementing AI tools.

In conclusion, as the healthcare landscape continues to evolve with the rapid integration of AI technologies, establishing clear governance and adoption policies is essential for CMOs and other leaders to ensure that AI tools enhance patient care while maintaining safety and ethical standards.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...