Essential Insights on the EU AI Act for Machine Builders

Understanding the EU AI Act for Machine-Builders

The EU AI Act aims to regulate artificial intelligence systems within the European Union, establishing a framework that impacts machine-builders significantly. This legislation promotes the development and use of human-centric and trustworthy AI, which is crucial as AI technology increasingly influences both personal and professional environments.

Risk Levels Defined by the EU AI Act

The Act categorizes AI systems into four levels of risk, with the highest risks being associated with systems that could adversely affect health, safety, or fundamental rights. For machine-builders, understanding these risk levels is essential, particularly as they may integrate AI into control systems for automation and robotics.

Compliance Timeline

Key dates for compliance are critical for machine-builders:

  • 1 August 2024: The Artificial Intelligence Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 comes into force.
  • 2 August 2026: Most regulations will apply.
  • 2 August 2027: High-risk AI systems used as safety components must comply with the regulations.

Machine-builders supplying machinery to the EU must comply with the AI Act, even if the systems are operated outside the EU but impact users within it.

Compliance Steps for Machine-Builders

Before an AI system can enter the market, it must be CE-marked. This requirement applies whether the AI system is sold independently or embedded within other products:

  • If embedded, the product manufacturer assumes the role of the provider and is responsible for compliance.
  • The AI Act differentiates between providers (e.g., machine-builders) and deployers (e.g., end-users).

Conformity Assessment Procedures

Similar to the Machinery Directive, the AI Act outlines conformity assessment procedures, which may involve:

  • Self-certification for many high-risk AI systems.
  • Utilizing Notified Bodies for third-party assessments, which require re-certification every five years.

Complying with harmonised standards will facilitate adherence to the requirements, although these standards are still being developed.

Declaration of Conformity

Once compliance is achieved, a Declaration of Conformity (DoC) can be issued. If the AI system is part of another product, the DoC may be included in that product’s documentation.

Post-Market Obligations

After market entry, providers must conduct ongoing monitoring of high-risk AI systems throughout their lifecycle. Obligations include:

  • Reporting any serious incidents to the appropriate authorities.
  • Implementing automatic event logging for better surveillance.

Substantial modifications to AI systems post-approval necessitate re-assessment for compliance.

Penalties for Non-Compliance

The AI Act stipulates strict penalties for non-compliance, which can include fines of up to €15 million or 3% of the organization’s annual global revenue. Higher fines apply to prohibited AI systems.

Understanding the EU AI Act is essential for machine-builders, as it not only outlines the necessary steps for compliance but also aims to foster innovation and investment in AI technologies. By adhering to this legislation, machine-builders can ensure their products are safe, effective, and aligned with ethical standards.

More Insights

US Rejects UN’s Call for Global AI Governance Framework

U.S. officials rejected the establishment of a global AI governance framework at the United Nations General Assembly, despite broad support from many nations, including China. Michael Kratsios of the...

Agentic AI: Managing the Risks of Autonomous Systems

As companies increasingly adopt agentic AI systems for autonomous decision-making, they face the emerging challenge of agentic AI sprawl, which can lead to security vulnerabilities and operational...

AI as a New Opinion Gatekeeper: Addressing Hidden Biases

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into sectors like healthcare and finance, a new study highlights the potential for subtle biases in AI systems to distort public...

AI Accountability: A New Era of Regulation and Compliance

The burgeoning world of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is at a critical juncture as regulatory actions signal a new era of accountability and ethical deployment. Recent events highlight the shift...

Choosing Effective AI Governance Tools for Safer Adoption

As generative AI continues to evolve, so do the associated risks, making AI governance tools essential for managing these challenges. This initiative, in collaboration with Tokio Marine Group, aims to...

UN Initiatives for Trustworthy AI Governance

The United Nations is working to influence global policy on artificial intelligence by establishing an expert panel to develop standards for "safe, secure and trustworthy" AI. This initiative aims to...

Data-Driven Governance: Shaping AI Regulation in Singapore

The conversation between Thomas Roehm from SAS and Frankie Phua from United Overseas Bank at the SAS Innovate On Tour in Singapore explores how data-driven regulation can effectively govern rapidly...

Preparing SMEs for EU AI Compliance Challenges

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) must navigate the complexities of the EU AI Act, which categorizes many AI applications as "high-risk" and imposes strict compliance requirements. To adapt...

Draft Guidance on Reporting Serious Incidents Under the EU AI Act

On September 26, 2025, the European Commission published draft guidance on serious incident reporting requirements for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act. Organizations developing or deploying...