Enhancing AI Trust through Transparency and Explainability

Transparency and Explainability of AI Systems: From Ethical Guidelines to Requirements

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into various sectors is revolutionizing decision-making processes, yet it brings forth a host of ethical considerations, particularly regarding the transparency and explainability of AI systems. This study delves into the ethical guidelines established by organizations and explores how these guidelines can translate into practical requirements for developing responsible AI systems.

1. Introduction

AI’s role in daily life has expanded significantly, affecting critical domains like loan processing, criminal identification, and cancer detection. Despite the growing adoption of AI technologies, the black-box nature of many AI systems has raised concerns about their ethical implications. Organizations worldwide, including those from the IEEE and ACM, have begun to address these concerns by formulating comprehensive ethical guidelines aimed at ensuring responsible AI usage.

2. Ethical Requirements of AI Systems

The ethical requirements for AI systems are derived from fundamental ethical principles. These requirements encompass both functional and quality requirements, which are essential for addressing stakeholder needs while adhering to ethical norms. Among these, transparency and explainability stand out as critical quality requirements.

3. Transparency as a Quality Requirement

Transparency in AI systems is increasingly recognized as a vital non-functional requirement (NFR). It facilitates user trust and promotes accountability within AI systems. The challenge lies in defining what transparency entails, especially given the complexity of AI algorithms. Recent studies have indicated that transparency is not merely about clarity but also involves trust, privacy, and accuracy in AI systems.

4. Explainability as a Quality Requirement

Similarly, explainability has emerged as a crucial quality requirement that enhances the user’s understanding of AI decisions. It entails providing insights into how decisions are made and the logic behind them. Studies emphasize that explanations can significantly impact users’ trust and their overall experience with AI systems.

5. The Role of Ethical Guidelines

Organizations have increasingly adopted ethical guidelines that emphasize the need for transparency and explainability in AI development. For instance, the guidelines highlight various stakeholders who require clear explanations regarding AI operations, including users, customers, and developers. These guidelines also outline the various aspects that need to be explained, such as the purpose and limitations of the AI systems.

6. Components of Explainability

The study proposes a model of explainability components essential for defining explainability requirements in AI systems. These components include:

  • Addressees: Identifying who needs explanations.
  • Aspects: Determining what needs to be explained.
  • Contexts: Understanding the situations in which explanations are required.
  • Explainers: Identifying who will provide the explanations.

7. Empirical Study: Methodology and Findings

The empirical study conducted involved analyzing the ethical guidelines of various organizations and engaging practitioners in workshops to define explainability requirements. The findings underscored the importance of a clear purpose for AI systems, as well as the need for multidisciplinary collaboration in the development process.

8. Practical Implications

As organizations strive to implement ethical AI systems, understanding the interplay between transparency, explainability, and user trust becomes increasingly critical. The practical implications of this study suggest that organizations can enhance their AI systems by adopting clear ethical guidelines and fostering an environment where stakeholders can collaboratively address the challenges posed by AI technologies.

9. Conclusion

In conclusion, the study highlights the necessity for organizations to prioritize transparency and explainability in AI development. By integrating ethical guidelines into practical requirements, organizations can develop AI systems that not only perform effectively but also foster trust and accountability among users.

More Insights

US Rejects UN’s Call for Global AI Governance Framework

U.S. officials rejected the establishment of a global AI governance framework at the United Nations General Assembly, despite broad support from many nations, including China. Michael Kratsios of the...

Agentic AI: Managing the Risks of Autonomous Systems

As companies increasingly adopt agentic AI systems for autonomous decision-making, they face the emerging challenge of agentic AI sprawl, which can lead to security vulnerabilities and operational...

AI as a New Opinion Gatekeeper: Addressing Hidden Biases

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into sectors like healthcare and finance, a new study highlights the potential for subtle biases in AI systems to distort public...

AI Accountability: A New Era of Regulation and Compliance

The burgeoning world of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is at a critical juncture as regulatory actions signal a new era of accountability and ethical deployment. Recent events highlight the shift...

Choosing Effective AI Governance Tools for Safer Adoption

As generative AI continues to evolve, so do the associated risks, making AI governance tools essential for managing these challenges. This initiative, in collaboration with Tokio Marine Group, aims to...

UN Initiatives for Trustworthy AI Governance

The United Nations is working to influence global policy on artificial intelligence by establishing an expert panel to develop standards for "safe, secure and trustworthy" AI. This initiative aims to...

Data-Driven Governance: Shaping AI Regulation in Singapore

The conversation between Thomas Roehm from SAS and Frankie Phua from United Overseas Bank at the SAS Innovate On Tour in Singapore explores how data-driven regulation can effectively govern rapidly...

Preparing SMEs for EU AI Compliance Challenges

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) must navigate the complexities of the EU AI Act, which categorizes many AI applications as "high-risk" and imposes strict compliance requirements. To adapt...

Draft Guidance on Reporting Serious Incidents Under the EU AI Act

On September 26, 2025, the European Commission published draft guidance on serious incident reporting requirements for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act. Organizations developing or deploying...