Confronting the Risks of Shadow AI in the Enterprise

IBM Tackles Shadow AI: An Enterprise Blind Spot

As the use of AI in enterprise applications continues to surge, organizations are facing the challenge of managing shadow AI—the unregulated use of AI tools that could lead to significant security and governance risks. In response, IBM has launched innovative tools aimed at helping businesses navigate this emerging landscape.

The Rise of Shadow AI

Similar to its predecessor, shadow IT, shadow AI refers to the ungoverned use of AI technologies within an organization. With AI tools becoming increasingly accessible, employees can now create autonomous systems with minimal technical expertise. This shift presents a unique challenge, as the potential benefits of AI agents may also introduce substantial risks.

Understanding the Scale of the Problem

Recent research from Zoho’s ManageEngine reveals alarming statistics: 60% of employees are using unapproved AI tools more frequently than in the past year. Furthermore, 93% admitted to inputting information into AI tools without prior approval. Among these, 32% have entered confidential client data without confirmation from their company, exposing organizations to risks of data leakage and compliance violations.

Moreover, a stark disconnect exists between the perceptions of IT leadership and employees. While 97% of IT decision-makers recognize significant risks associated with shadow AI, 91% of employees perceive little to no risk, believing that the rewards outweigh any potential dangers.

The Business Impact of Shadow AI

The implications of shadow AI are profound. IT decision-makers identify data leakage as the primary risk, affecting 63% of organizations. Other significant concerns include intellectual property infringement, compliance violations, and the potential for AI systems to make decisions counter to company policies or values.

David Mytton, CEO of a developer security software provider, emphasizes the privacy issues associated with shadow AI, noting that sending sensitive company data to unregulated AI systems could lead to severe legal and operational challenges.

Why Shadow AI is Different

The emergence of AI agents represents a new frontier in this challenge. Unlike traditional software, AI agents can operate autonomously and make decisions independently. This capability amplifies the risks, as these systems can function without human oversight, often without the knowledge of IT departments.

IBM’s Ritika Gunnar highlights the need for organizations to recognize that while AI agents could revolutionize productivity, they also necessitate rigorous governance and security frameworks.

Detection and Mitigation Strategies

Identifying shadow AI requires novel approaches, as traditional IT monitoring tools are ill-equipped to detect AI agents embedded in business applications. IBM has developed specialized detection capabilities through collaborations that aim to provide visibility into an increasingly decentralized AI ecosystem.

New capabilities in Guardium AI Security allow organizations to detect AI use cases in cloud environments, code repositories, and embedded systems. Once identified, these AI systems can be brought under governance frameworks, ensuring compliance with organizational policies.

The Road Ahead

As AI technology continues to evolve, the shadow AI landscape is likely to become more complex. Organizations must shift from reactive detection to proactive management of AI tools. This involves integrating approved AI tools into standard workflows and establishing comprehensive governance frameworks that can scale with AI adoption.

Ultimately, the goal is not to eliminate shadow AI but to transform it from a hidden liability into a visible, manageable, and strategic asset. By addressing both security threats and business needs, organizations can harness the potential of AI while safeguarding their interests.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...