Colorado’s AI Act: Legislative Setback and Compliance Challenges Ahead

Colorado Legislature Fails to Amend Recent Artificial Intelligence Act

The Colorado Legislature’s recent decision to reject proposed amendments to the Artificial Intelligence Act has sparked significant discussion among stakeholders in the technology sector. This act, originally passed in 2024, represents the first comprehensive state-level legislation in the U.S. aimed at regulating the use of artificial intelligence (AI).

Background of the Artificial Intelligence Act

In 2024, Colorado enacted the Artificial Intelligence Act, imposing strict regulations on developers and users of “high-risk” AI systems. This legislation particularly targets sectors such as employment, housing, finance, and healthcare. However, the Act has faced considerable criticism for its complexity and scope, with concerns that it may hinder innovation.

The Proposal of Senate Bill 25-318

In early 2025, in response to rising concerns from the tech industry, employers, and even Governor Jared Polis, lawmakers introduced Senate Bill (SB) 25-318. The intent behind this bill was to soften and clarify some of the more burdensome aspects of the original legislation ahead of the compliance deadline set for February 1, 2026.

Key Amendments Proposed

SB 25-318 aimed to introduce several amendments, including:

  • An exception to the definition of “developer” for individuals offering an AI system with open model weights, provided they meet specified conditions.
  • Exemptions for certain technologies from the stringent requirements.
  • The elimination of the requirement for developers or deployers to exercise reasonable care to protect consumers from known or foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination.
  • An exemption from certain disclosure requirements for developers who satisfy specific financial and operational criteria.

Outcome of the Legislative Vote

Despite the proposed amendments’ intention to balance innovation with necessary regulations, SB 25-318 was ultimately voted down 5-2 by the Senate Business, Labor, and Technology Committee on May 5, 2025. As a result, the original Artificial Intelligence Act remains in effect.

Next Steps for Compliance

Following the failure of SB 25-318, the next crucial step involves the Colorado Attorney General issuing rules and guidance regarding the original Act. Businesses and developers operating in Colorado must now prepare for full compliance with the Act by early 2026, unless the compliance date is extended.

For those with questions regarding compliance with Colorado’s Artificial Intelligence Act or related matters, it is advisable to consult with legal experts specializing in this area.

More Insights

Transforming Corporate Governance: The Impact of the EU AI Act

This research project investigates how the EU Artificial Intelligence Act is transforming corporate governance and accountability frameworks, compelling companies to reconfigure responsibilities and...

AI-Driven Cybersecurity: Bridging the Accountability Gap

As organizations increasingly adopt AI to drive innovation, they face a dual challenge: while AI enhances cybersecurity measures, it simultaneously facilitates more sophisticated cyberattacks. The...

Thailand’s Comprehensive AI Governance Strategy

Thailand is drafting principles for artificial intelligence (AI) legislation aimed at establishing an AI ecosystem and enhancing user protection from potential risks. The legislation will remove legal...

Texas Implements Groundbreaking AI Regulations in Healthcare

Texas has enacted comprehensive AI governance laws, including the Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA) and Senate Bill 1188, which establish a framework for responsible AI...

AI Governance: Balancing Innovation and Oversight

Riskonnect has launched its new AI Governance solution, enabling organizations to manage the risks and compliance obligations of AI technologies while fostering innovation. The solution integrates...

AI Alignment: Ensuring Technology Serves Human Values

Gillian K. Hadfield has been appointed as the Bloomberg Distinguished Professor of AI Alignment and Governance at Johns Hopkins University, where she will focus on ensuring that artificial...

The Ethical Dilemma of Face Swap Technology

As AI technology evolves, face swap tools are increasingly misused for creating non-consensual explicit content, leading to significant ethical, emotional, and legal consequences. This article...

The Illusion of Influence: The EU AI Act’s Global Reach

The EU AI Act, while aiming to set a regulatory framework for artificial intelligence, faces challenges in influencing other countries due to differing legal and cultural values. This has led to the...

The Illusion of Influence: The EU AI Act’s Global Reach

The EU AI Act, while aiming to set a regulatory framework for artificial intelligence, faces challenges in influencing other countries due to differing legal and cultural values. This has led to the...