South Korea’s AI Basic Act will require AI providers to establish an in-country representative to ensure compliance with safety and governance requirements. The legislation aims to stimulate investment in the AI industry while promoting responsible oversight and innovation.
The “Basic Act on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Development and Trust Building” recently passed in South Korea aims to balance regulation and promotion of AI technologies, positioning the country as a leader in AI legislation. It establishes a framework for responsible AI advancement while prioritizing job creation and transparency in high-impact AI applications.
The EU AI Act, adopted in June 2024, represents a significant regulatory effort to oversee artificial intelligence across member states, influencing how public authorities utilize AI systems in various administrative contexts. By establishing procedural obligations and triggering the application of EU fundamental rights principles, the AI Act may lead to the Europeanisation of national administrative law and reshape the interplay between EU and domestic public law in digital regulation.
A new state-level AI bill in Texas, known as the Responsible AI Governance Act (TRAIGA), aims to regulate the use of AI and prevent discrimination by imposing compliance obligations on developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems. The bill could have significant implications for AI deployment in Texas, especially in areas like recruitment, while critics warn it may lead to overreach and complicate federal AI regulation efforts.
Texas Representative Giovanni Capriglione has filed House Bill 1709, the proposed Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act, to create comprehensive regulations for AI development. The bill aims to ensure public trust and safety while fostering innovation in the state’s rapidly evolving AI landscape.
The document discusses the current state of AI regulation in the United States, highlighting the reliance on existing federal laws while noting the challenges posed by a patchwork of state and local regulations. It outlines various proposed AI bills in Congress aimed at addressing issues such as safety, privacy, and discrimination in AI applications.
Artificial intelligence will be regulated differently in Northern Ireland and Britain as a new EU law takes effect next month, creating a digital border that may impact local businesses. This regulatory divergence raises concerns among politicians and experts about its potential effects on Northern Ireland’s AI industry.
The EU’s AI Act will start implementing critical aspects on February 2, 2025, specifically targeting prohibited AI practices that present unacceptable risks. Non-compliance can result in hefty fines, emphasizing the importance for organizations to evaluate their AI systems against these regulations.
Ireland benefits from specific exemptions under the EU AI Act, particularly concerning AI used in law enforcement, as outlined in Recital 40. These exemptions allow Ireland to maintain autonomy in regulating biometric AI systems and other high-risk AI applications without adhering to certain EU provisions.
The European Commission’s AI Office has published a second draft of the Code of Practice for general-purpose AI, which includes measures previously rejected during the AI Act negotiations. CCIA Europe warns that if left unaddressed, the drafting process could undermine the legislative integrity of the AI Act and jeopardize the interests of AI developers and innovators.
Take the first steps in your transformation towards international AI compliance.
Our expert sales team is here to answer your questions, just leave your email and we’ll get in touch.
