California’s Landmark AI Transparency Act: Key Requirements and Implications

New California AI Transparency Act: An Overview

On September 19, 2024, California Governor Gavin Newsom enacted the California AI Transparency Act. This landmark legislation mandates that providers of generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems implement stringent transparency and disclosure measures aimed at enhancing user awareness.

Key Provisions of the Act

The California AI Transparency Act requires covered providers to:

  • Make available an AI detection tool at no cost to users.
  • Offer users the option to include a manifest disclosure indicating that content is AI-generated.
  • Include a latent disclosure in AI-generated content.
  • Enter into contracts with licensees to ensure the maintenance of the AI system’s capability to include latent disclosures.

This law is recognized as the nation’s most comprehensive and specific AI watermarking regulation, set to take effect on January 1, 2026.

Key Definitions

The provisions of the California AI Transparency Act apply to “covered providers,” which are defined as:

A person that creates, codes, or otherwise produces a generative artificial intelligence system that has over 1,000,000 monthly visitors or users and is publicly accessible within California.

Additionally, a generative artificial intelligence system is defined as:

An artificial intelligence that can generate derived synthetic content, including text, images, video, and audio, that emulates the structure and characteristics of the system’s training data.

The term artificial intelligence refers to:

An engineered or machine-based system that varies in its level of autonomy and that can, for explicit or implicit objectives, infer from the input it receives how to generate outputs that can influence physical or virtual environments.

Compliance Requirements for Covered Providers

Covered providers must adhere to the following transparency requirements:

  • Provide users with AI detection tools that assess whether content has been created or altered using a generative AI system. These tools must include system provenance data to help users verify the authenticity of the content.
  • Implement both latent and manifest disclosures in AI-generated content. Manifest disclosures must be clear and conspicuous, while latent disclosures must convey essential metadata about the content.
  • Ensure that third-party licensees are capable of maintaining these disclosure requirements, with a mandate to revoke licenses if they fail to comply within 96 hours.

Enforcement and Penalties

The California Attorney General, city attorneys, and county counsels will enforce the law, which includes civil penalties of $5,000 per day for violations.

Implications for the Industry

This law positions California alongside Colorado, Utah, and Illinois in requiring AI transparency. However, California stands out as the first state to establish detailed regulations concerning watermarking.

Companies engaged in developing generative AI systems must be aware of these specific requirements as they allocate resources toward technology development. Furthermore, licensors and licensees of covered AI systems should consider updating their contractual agreements to meet the new disclosure obligations.

Conclusion

As the landscape of artificial intelligence continues to evolve, the California AI Transparency Act sets a precedent for accountability and user awareness in AI applications. Stakeholders in the AI industry must prepare for the changes this law will bring, ensuring compliance and fostering trust among users.

More Insights

US Rejects UN’s Call for Global AI Governance Framework

U.S. officials rejected the establishment of a global AI governance framework at the United Nations General Assembly, despite broad support from many nations, including China. Michael Kratsios of the...

Agentic AI: Managing the Risks of Autonomous Systems

As companies increasingly adopt agentic AI systems for autonomous decision-making, they face the emerging challenge of agentic AI sprawl, which can lead to security vulnerabilities and operational...

AI as a New Opinion Gatekeeper: Addressing Hidden Biases

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into sectors like healthcare and finance, a new study highlights the potential for subtle biases in AI systems to distort public...

AI Accountability: A New Era of Regulation and Compliance

The burgeoning world of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is at a critical juncture as regulatory actions signal a new era of accountability and ethical deployment. Recent events highlight the shift...

Choosing Effective AI Governance Tools for Safer Adoption

As generative AI continues to evolve, so do the associated risks, making AI governance tools essential for managing these challenges. This initiative, in collaboration with Tokio Marine Group, aims to...

UN Initiatives for Trustworthy AI Governance

The United Nations is working to influence global policy on artificial intelligence by establishing an expert panel to develop standards for "safe, secure and trustworthy" AI. This initiative aims to...

Data-Driven Governance: Shaping AI Regulation in Singapore

The conversation between Thomas Roehm from SAS and Frankie Phua from United Overseas Bank at the SAS Innovate On Tour in Singapore explores how data-driven regulation can effectively govern rapidly...

Preparing SMEs for EU AI Compliance Challenges

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) must navigate the complexities of the EU AI Act, which categorizes many AI applications as "high-risk" and imposes strict compliance requirements. To adapt...

Draft Guidance on Reporting Serious Incidents Under the EU AI Act

On September 26, 2025, the European Commission published draft guidance on serious incident reporting requirements for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act. Organizations developing or deploying...