CAIDP Backs Experts for New UN AI Scientific Panel

CAIDP Endorses Experts for New UN AI Scientific Panelh2>

The Center for AI and Digital Policy (CAIDP) has endorsed five candidates for the UN’s newly established global b>AI panelb>, which aims to strengthen evidence-based understanding of b>artificial intelligenceb>.p>

Endorsements from CAIDPh3>

CAIDP, an independent b>nonprofitb> organization that promotes responsible technology governance, announced its endorsements for membership in the United Nations’ new b>International AI Scientific Panelb>.p>

In a LinkedIn post, CAIDP expressed support for five candidates:p>

    li>b>Professor Virginia Dignumb> of Umeå University and Delft University of Technology;li>
    li>b>Professor Arisa Emab> of The University of Tokyo;li>
    li>b>Professor Alondra Nelsonb> of the Institute for Advanced Study;li>
    li>b>Professor Stuart Russellb> of the University of California, Berkeley;li>
    li>b>Professor Emma Ruttkamp-Bloemb> of the University of Pretoria.li>
    ul>

    Global Framework for AI Governanceh3>

    The panel, established under b>UN Resolution A/RES/79/325b>, will bring together 40 experts serving in their personal capacities for a three-year term beginning in 2026. According to the UN, it will “play a key role in advancing global, evidence-based understanding of artificial intelligence (AI).”p>

    The Secretary-General will recommend members to the General Assembly based on expertise, interdisciplinarity, and geographical and gender balance.p>

    CAIDP has strongly supported the creation of the AI Scientific Panel in earlier statements to the UN, referencing its 2023 report b>Global AI Governance: A Five-Point Plan for the UN Advisory Board on AIb>. The organization has long advocated for a structure modeled on the b>Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)b>, which provides annual assessments on AI developments for UN member states.p>

    CAIDP emphasized that technical metrics alone should not determine AI risk. “We are concerned that the methodology put in place to assess global AI risk will prioritize technical characteristics without considering the impact that AI systems may have on fundamental rights and sustainable development,” the organization stated.p>

    The Center’s recommendations urge that assessments align with the b>Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)b> and the UN’s b>Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)b>. “Progress would therefore be measured by alignment with the universal values previously established by the UN,” the post noted.p>

    UN Commitment to Inclusive Developmenth3>

    The UN established the panel following the b>Global Digital Compactb> adopted at the 2024 Summit of the Future, which called for an “open, safe, and inclusive digital future.” The creation of the AI body was part of broader efforts to ensure that governance frameworks keep pace with technological change.p>

    UN Secretary-General António Guterres remarked, “We must prevent a world of AI ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots’. We must all work together so that artificial intelligence can bridge the gap between developed and developing countries—not widen it. It must accelerate sustainable development—not entrench inequalities.”p>

    The deadline for applications to join the panel is b>October 31, 2025b>, with the final list of 40 members to be confirmed by the UN General Assembly.p>

    CAIDP views the creation of the panel as a significant opportunity for global coordination in AI policy. “UN member states need better information about the capabilities of AI systems and annual, evidence-based assessments,” the organization concluded.p>

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...

AI in Australian Government: Balancing Innovation and Security Risks

The Australian government is considering using AI to draft sensitive cabinet submissions as part of a broader strategy to implement AI across the public service. While some public servants report...