Brussels Spring: Progress and Challenges of the AI Act and DMA

A View from Brussels: The Progress of the AI Act and Digital Markets Act

As spring blooms in Brussels, bringing vibrant flowers and a sense of renewal, the reality of European policymaking unfolds with significant advancements in digital regulation. The Digital Markets Act (DMA) and the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) are now actively shaping the landscape of technology in Europe.

Key Developments in the Digital Markets Act

Recent decisions by the EU competition team regarding the Digital Markets Act have marked an important milestone. Executive Vice-President for a Clean, Just and Competitive Transition, Teresa Ribera, highlighted that “gatekeepers” are adapting their business models, resulting in tangible benefits for European consumers. The European Commission not only designated these gatekeepers but also responded to ecosystem changes—for instance, the reclassification of Facebook Marketplace as a core platform due to its failure to meet the necessary criteria.

Ribera emphasized the Commission’s commitment to enforcing the DMA, including ongoing investigations into major tech players like Apple and Google. This enforcement is crucial for maintaining a competitive digital market and ensuring that the benefits of regulation reach consumers.

Implications of the Artificial Intelligence Act

In parallel, the Artificial Intelligence Act, which came into force in August 2024, has established ambitious timelines for the AI Office to deliver a comprehensive range of outputs. This includes up to 60 deliverables encompassing guidelines, methodologies, and standards addressing various aspects of AI implementation.

The act aims to provide concrete requirements for AI systems, particularly high-risk applications. Among the anticipated outputs is the General-Purpose AI Code of Practice, which is set to come into effect on August 2. This code is designed to translate the AI Act’s requirements into actionable steps for providers of general-purpose AI models.

However, the consultation process for this code has faced criticism, with stakeholders expressing concerns over the limited opportunities for substantive input and the perceived dilution of the tech community’s concerns during discussions.

Looking Ahead

The anticipated Code of Practice is expected to be finalized by May 2, providing a brief window for AI model providers to align with the new requirements. The importance of this regulation cannot be understated, as it aims to ensure that AI technologies are developed and deployed responsibly and transparently.

With these regulatory frameworks in place, Europe is poised to navigate the evolving landscape of digital technology with a focus on consumer protection, competitive markets, and ethical AI deployment. As policymakers continue to refine these initiatives, the impact on the technology sector and consumers alike will be closely monitored.

More Insights

AI Compliance Risks: Safeguarding Against Emerging Threats

The rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative AI, presents both opportunities and significant risks for businesses regarding compliance with legal and regulatory...

Building Effective AI Literacy Programs for Compliance and Success

The EU AI Act mandates that providers and deployers of AI systems ensure a sufficient level of AI literacy among their staff and others involved in AI operations. This obligation applies to anyone...

Ethics at the Crossroads of AI Innovation

As artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly influences critical decision-making across various sectors, the need for robust ethical governance frameworks becomes essential. Organizations must...

Croatia’s Path to Responsible AI Legislation

EDRi affiliate Politiscope hosted an event in Croatia to discuss the human rights impacts of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and to influence national policy ahead of the implementation of the EU AI Act...

The Legal Dilemma of AI Personhood

As artificial intelligence systems evolve to make decisions and act independently, the legal frameworks that govern them are struggling to keep pace. This raises critical questions about whether AI...

Data Provenance: The Foundation of Effective AI Governance for CISOs

The article emphasizes the critical role of data provenance in ensuring effective AI governance within organizations, highlighting the need for continuous oversight and accountability in AI...

Balancing AI Governance in the Philippines

A lawmaker in the Philippines, Senator Grace Poe, emphasizes the need for a balanced approach in regulating artificial intelligence (AI) to ensure ethical and innovative use of the technology. She...

China’s Open-Source Strategy: Redefining AI Governance

China's advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) are increasingly driven by open-source collaboration among tech giants like Alibaba, Baidu, and Tencent, positioning the country to influence...

Mastering AI Governance: Nine Essential Steps

As organizations increasingly adopt artificial intelligence (AI), it is essential to implement effective AI governance to ensure data integrity, accountability, and security. The nine-point framework...