Bridging the AI Confidence Gap: Insights for CEOs

Understanding the Disconnect: AI Concerns Among CEOs and the Public

The recent study by EY reveals a significant gap between the perceptions of CEOs regarding artificial intelligence (AI) concerns and the actual worries expressed by the public. This disconnect poses a potential threat to the future of AI integration within enterprises, as executives may be misinformed about the issues that truly matter to consumers.

The AI Gap: Executives vs. Consumers

According to EY’s research, when comparing responses from senior executives to a separate survey of over 15,000 consumers across 15 countries, the disparity was greater than anticipated. On various measures of responsible AI—ranging from data accuracy to privacy protection—the general public exhibited approximately twice the level of concern compared to CEOs.

This disconnect is not merely academic; it has the potential to undermine the burgeoning multi-billion-pound AI market as companies invest heavily in technologies that may be met with public resistance.

Overconfidence Among Mature AI Adopters

As companies rush to implement large language models (LLMs) across various sectors such as customer service and financial planning, EY’s research indicates a troubling trend: organizations that consider themselves AI veterans often display overconfidence in their understanding of consumer sentiment. For instance, among firms claiming to have fully integrated AI, a staggering 71% of executives believe they grasp consumer concerns, compared to just 51% in companies still navigating the technology.

Interestingly, those newer to AI tend to resonate more closely with public opinion. Executives at firms in the early stages of AI deployment express genuine concerns about privacy, security, and reliability, reflecting the anxieties of consumers.

Bridging the Gap: EY’s Nine Principles for Responsible AI

In light of these findings, EY has introduced a nine-point responsible AI framework designed to address shortcomings in corporate governance regarding AI.

Key Principles Include:

  • Accountability
  • Data Protection
  • Reliability
  • Security
  • Transparency
  • Explainability
  • Fairness
  • Compliance
  • Sustainability

This framework directly addresses consumer concerns. For example, data protection ensures that AI systems maintain the confidentiality of personal information while adhering to ethical norms. Similarly, transparency necessitates appropriate disclosure about AI system purposes and designs, allowing users to understand and assess outputs.

Challenges Ahead: The Next Wave of AI

As companies prepare to leverage more advanced AI systems capable of autonomous decision-making, EY warns that the challenges will intensify. Half of the executives surveyed admit their current risk management strategies may not be sufficient for these emerging technologies.

Moreover, over 51% of executives state it is already challenging to establish proper oversight for current AI tools, making the need for robust governance more pressing than ever.

Closing the Communication Gap

Despite the substantial disconnect between executive perceptions and consumer concerns, the data reveals a positive trend: CEOs generally exhibit a better understanding of public sentiment compared to their fellow board members. This suggests a vital communication gap within organizations, as CEOs who are attuned to consumer concerns often struggle to relay this understanding throughout their companies.

A Three-Step Solution

To combat these challenges, EY proposes a comprehensive three-pronged approach:

  1. Listen: Involve the entire C-suite in customer interactions to bridge the gap between executives and consumers.
  2. Act: Integrate responsible AI considerations throughout the development process, utilizing human-centric design practices.
  3. Communicate: Position responsible AI as a competitive advantage, emphasizing transparency about governance processes.

Conclusion: The Competitive Opportunity in Responsible AI

Although many companies perceive responsible AI as a compliance burden, the findings suggest it could serve as a significant competitive advantage. By prioritizing transparency and effective governance, organizations can distinguish themselves in a crowded market and build trust with consumers.

Ultimately, embracing responsible AI not only mitigates risks but also enhances brand reputation, enabling companies to thrive in an increasingly AI-driven world.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...