Balancing Innovation and Compliance in the Age of AI

EU AI Act: A Framework for Innovation in Legal Departments

The EU AI Act serves as a crucial framework for legal department leaders who are increasingly exploring how generative artificial intelligence can drive efficiency and innovation within their organizations. However, the intersection of technological advancement and regulatory compliance presents unique challenges that require careful navigation.

The Regulatory Landscape

As organizations embrace innovative technologies, a pressing question arises: does regulation support or hinder progress? The complexity of achieving regulatory compliance becomes more pronounced with the introduction of AI technologies, where overlapping laws and regulations can create confusion. For instance, a company’s compliance with a data privacy law in one state may conflict with its obligations under antitrust laws or government reporting requirements.

When AI is added to the mix, these concerns intensify. AI implementation can introduce a myriad of issues across various corporate activities, compounded by emerging AI-specific laws both in the US and globally.

Compliance Guardrails

Organizations must first map the intricate web of overlapping compliance requirements before implementing the necessary policies and procedures to establish compliance guardrails. While some may perceive these challenges as barriers to innovation, they can also be viewed as opportunities to assess potential risks and provide a roadmap for responsible innovation.

For example, a recent industry report revealed that a majority of chief legal officers express caution regarding the use of generative AI within their organizations, citing the need for robust governance due to the associated risks.

Identifying Risks

In a study exploring concerns related to generative AI, respondents identified over 15 unique risk areas, with security topping the list. Other concerns included explainability, defensibility, potential for new litigation types, creation of harmful content, regulatory challenges, bias, ethics, and data privacy. Alarmingly, 85% of respondents felt minimally prepared to tackle these risks.

Innovation Guideposts

For legal leaders feeling unprepared, the EU AI Act and similar regulations can serve as guideposts for innovating while mitigating risks. The European Commission has provided foundational guidance addressing critical areas, including the definition of AI and prohibited AI practices. This guidance complements the EU AI Act’s provisions that mandate AI literacy within organizations adopting new AI technologies.

Product-Level Regulation

The EU AI Act introduces product-level regulation for AI systems deemed to pose unacceptable or high risks to individuals and society. High-risk applications are subject to stringent requirements, such as:

  • Activity logging to ensure results can be traced
  • Robust risk assessment and mitigation processes
  • Comprehensive documentation of all activities
  • High levels of cybersecurity and accuracy

These foundational elements aid organizations in incorporating best practices within their product innovation processes. Interestingly, the European Commission has indicated that most AI systems in use fall into limited, minimal, or no-risk categories, with limited-risk systems required to meet specific transparency obligations.

Aligning with Data Privacy Standards

The EU AI Act is notably aligned with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), providing a framework for upholding data privacy standards in AI systems. While this alignment may complicate an organization’s data privacy strategy, it ultimately equips companies to avoid misuse of personal information and data privacy violations.

Conclusion

Generative AI presents unparalleled opportunities for the legal field, enabling enhanced efficiencies and transformative processes. However, it is imperative that these advancements align with comprehensive risk management strategies. By adopting a balanced approach, organizations can leverage compliance as a catalyst for innovation, fostering proactive and sustainable methods that work in tandem with technological design and experimentation.

More Insights

US Rejects UN’s Call for Global AI Governance Framework

U.S. officials rejected the establishment of a global AI governance framework at the United Nations General Assembly, despite broad support from many nations, including China. Michael Kratsios of the...

Agentic AI: Managing the Risks of Autonomous Systems

As companies increasingly adopt agentic AI systems for autonomous decision-making, they face the emerging challenge of agentic AI sprawl, which can lead to security vulnerabilities and operational...

AI as a New Opinion Gatekeeper: Addressing Hidden Biases

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into sectors like healthcare and finance, a new study highlights the potential for subtle biases in AI systems to distort public...

AI Accountability: A New Era of Regulation and Compliance

The burgeoning world of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is at a critical juncture as regulatory actions signal a new era of accountability and ethical deployment. Recent events highlight the shift...

Choosing Effective AI Governance Tools for Safer Adoption

As generative AI continues to evolve, so do the associated risks, making AI governance tools essential for managing these challenges. This initiative, in collaboration with Tokio Marine Group, aims to...

UN Initiatives for Trustworthy AI Governance

The United Nations is working to influence global policy on artificial intelligence by establishing an expert panel to develop standards for "safe, secure and trustworthy" AI. This initiative aims to...

Data-Driven Governance: Shaping AI Regulation in Singapore

The conversation between Thomas Roehm from SAS and Frankie Phua from United Overseas Bank at the SAS Innovate On Tour in Singapore explores how data-driven regulation can effectively govern rapidly...

Preparing SMEs for EU AI Compliance Challenges

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) must navigate the complexities of the EU AI Act, which categorizes many AI applications as "high-risk" and imposes strict compliance requirements. To adapt...

Draft Guidance on Reporting Serious Incidents Under the EU AI Act

On September 26, 2025, the European Commission published draft guidance on serious incident reporting requirements for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act. Organizations developing or deploying...