AI Regulatory Violations to Drive Surge in Tech Legal Disputes by 2028

AI Regulatory Violations Projected to Cause Increased Legal Disputes Among Tech Firms by 2028

According to a recent survey conducted by Gartner, AI regulatory violations are expected to lead to a significant increase in legal disputes for tech companies, with estimates suggesting a 30% spike by the year 2028. This survey, which involved 360 IT leaders engaged in the deployment of generative AI (GenAI) tools, highlighted critical challenges within the industry.

Concerns Over Regulatory Compliance

The survey revealed that over 70% of IT leaders identified regulatory compliance as one of the top three challenges regarding the widespread deployment of productivity assistants powered by GenAI. Alarmingly, only 23% of respondents expressed high confidence in their organization’s ability to manage the security and governance aspects associated with GenAI tools.

The Impact of Global Regulations

Lydia Clougherty Jones, a senior director analyst at Gartner, noted that global AI regulations vary significantly across countries, reflecting each nation’s approach to aligning AI leadership, innovation, and risk mitigation. This disparity creates inconsistent compliance obligations, complicating the alignment of AI investments with tangible enterprise value, while exposing companies to potential liabilities.

Geopolitical Climate Influencing GenAI Strategies

The survey also indicated that the geopolitical climate is increasingly influencing GenAI strategies, with 57% of non-US IT leaders acknowledging that it moderately impacts their deployment strategies. Notably, 19% reported a significant impact. Despite this, nearly 60% of respondents indicated an inability or unwillingness to adopt non-US alternatives for GenAI tools.

Sentiment Towards AI Sovereignty

A recent webinar poll conducted by Gartner showed that 40% of respondents viewed their organization’s sentiment towards AI sovereignty positively, seeing it as an opportunity. Conversely, 36% maintained a neutral stance, adopting a “wait and see” approach. Furthermore, 66% of respondents indicated proactive engagement in response to sovereign AI strategies, while 52% reported making strategic adjustments as a direct result of these insights.

Recommendations for IT Leaders

Gartner emphasized the need for IT leaders to enhance the moderation of AI outputs. This can be achieved by training models for self-correction, establishing rigorous use-case review procedures to assess risks, and implementing control testing for AI-generated communications. Additionally, organizations are urged to increase model testing and sandboxing by forming cross-disciplinary teams that include decision engineers, data scientists, and legal experts to develop pre-testing protocols and validate model outputs against undesired conversational results.

As the landscape of AI continues to evolve, the importance of understanding and addressing regulatory challenges cannot be overstated. Tech firms must navigate these complexities to mitigate risks and harness the full potential of generative AI technologies.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...