AI Regulation: A Call for Accountability and Transparency

Artificial Intelligence Regulation: The Urgent Need for Accountability and Transparency

Artificial intelligence (AI) has evolved from being a mere tool for convenience to a significant decision-making entity that influences various aspects of life, including hiring, housing, health care, credit, education, and the criminal justice system. The current regulatory framework surrounding AI will determine whether it acts as a force for progress or becomes a catalyst for discrimination, manipulation, and harm.

The Call for Senate Bill 2

Senate Bill 2, titled “An Act Concerning Artificial Intelligence,”, aims to establish essential guidelines for ensuring fairness, accountability, and transparency in AI systems utilized within organizations. This legislation is a critical step toward safeguarding individuals from the potential negative impacts of AI.

Accountability in AI Decision-Making

A primary concern is that AI systems often make decisions without a clear line of responsibility. For instance, if an AI system denies a mortgage or rejects a job application, there must be a designated individual who can be held accountable for that decision. The lack of accountability transforms AI into a faceless authority making life-altering choices without oversight.

Under Senate Bill 2, organizations using AI for significant decisions must integrate human accountability into their systems. This stipulation ensures that a real person oversees AI-driven decisions, guaranteeing they are fair, unbiased, and legally compliant. Additionally, that individual is legally obligated to prevent discrimination based on race, gender, disability, or any other protected category.

Transparency: The Right to Know

Individuals should be informed whenever AI is deployed to make decisions impacting their lives. This includes decisions regarding job applications, loan approvals, and college acceptance. People deserve the right to know when an AI system is in use and should be provided with clear steps to appeal decisions if they believe they have been unjustly judged by an AI.

Preventing Harmful AI-Generated Content

The rise of synthetic images, deepfake videos, and other forms of AI-generated content poses a significant challenge. While AI can serve creative purposes, it is increasingly weaponized to disseminate misinformation, harassment, and manipulation of public perception.

For example, AI-generated images have been exploited to produce harmful fake content, ranging from deepfake revenge pornography to misleading political attacks. Such actions are not just unethical; they are dangerous. Senate Bill 2 mandates clear labeling for AI-generated images and videos to help individuals discern real content from manipulated media. Furthermore, maliciously creating fake images or videos with the intent to harm should be made illegal.

A Path Forward

Senate Bill 2 represents a proactive approach to ensure that AI serves the public good rather than becoming a tool for exploitation. The opportunity exists for Connecticut to lead in crafting robust, commonsense AI regulations. Immediate action is required to ensure accountability in AI decision-making, transparency in AI usage, and protections against harmful AI-generated content.

The future of AI should not be dictated solely by technology companies; it must be shaped by those it affects the most. The call for ethical, fair, and accountable AI is urgent and essential for a society that values equity and justice.

More Insights

CII Advocates for Strong AI Accountability in Financial Services

The Chartered Insurance Institute (CII) has urged for clear accountability frameworks and a skills strategy for the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in financial services. They emphasize the...

Regulating AI in APAC MedTech: Current Trends and Future Directions

The regulatory landscape for AI-enabled MedTech in the Asia Pacific region is still developing, with existing frameworks primarily governing other technologies. While countries like China, Japan, and...

New York’s AI Legislation: Key Changes Employers Must Know

In early 2025, New York proposed the NY AI Act and the AI Consumer Protection Act to regulate the use of artificial intelligence, particularly addressing algorithmic discrimination in employment...

Managing AI Risks: Effective Frameworks for Safe Implementation

This article discusses the importance of AI risk management frameworks to mitigate potential risks associated with artificial intelligence systems. It highlights various types of risks, including...

Essential Insights on the EU Artificial Intelligence Act for Tech Companies

The European Union has introduced the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), which aims to manage the risks and opportunities associated with AI technologies across Europe. This landmark regulation...

South Korea’s Landmark AI Basic Act: A New Era of Regulation

South Korea has established itself as a leader in AI regulation in Asia with the introduction of the AI Basic Act, which creates a comprehensive legal framework for artificial intelligence. This...

EU AI Act and DORA: Mastering Compliance in Financial Services

The EU AI Act and DORA are reshaping how financial entities manage AI risk by introducing new layers of compliance that demand transparency, accountability, and quantifiable risk assessments...

AI Governance: Bridging the Transatlantic Divide

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping economies, societies, and global governance, presenting both significant opportunities and risks. This chapter examines the divergent approaches of...

EU’s Ambitious Plan to Boost AI Development

The EU Commission is launching a new strategy to reduce barriers for the deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) across Europe, aiming to enhance the region's competitiveness on a global scale. The...