AI Recruitment Compliance: Key Insights for Employers in Bulgaria and the EU

AI in Recruitment: Key Considerations for Employers in Bulgaria and EU

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly shaping recruitment practices, transforming the way organizations assess and select candidates. AI tools offer a data-driven and efficient approach to finding talent, promising to streamline the hiring process, reduce human bias, and assist companies in identifying candidates quickly and accurately.

However, the growing use of AI in recruitment introduces challenges such as algorithmic bias, transparency, and the protection of personal data, which require careful consideration. The EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1020) sets stricter standards, compelling organizations in Bulgaria and the EU to balance the benefits of technological advancement with fairness, transparency, and respect for candidate rights.

Navigating Regulatory Compliance

As AI becomes integral to various business processes, including recruitment, organizations in Bulgaria and the EU must navigate a complex regulatory landscape. Two key regulations apply to the use of AI systems in hiring: the AI Act (EU Regulation 2024/1020) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (EU Regulation 2016/679).

AI systems intended for recruiting or selecting candidates are classified as “high-risk” under the AI Act, necessitating compliance with strict requirements designed to safeguard fairness, ensure transparency, and protect fundamental rights.

Responsibilities of Deployers

Under the AI Act, organizations using AI systems (e.g., employers and recruitment agencies) are generally considered “deployers”. They may be reclassified as “providers” and subject to more stringent obligations if they:

  • Put their name or trademark on a high-risk AI system that has already been placed on the market or put into service (unless a contract clearly assigns these responsibilities elsewhere).
  • Make a substantial modification to the system.
  • Change the intended purpose of the AI system.

Key Compliance Obligations for Deployers

Deployers of high-risk AI systems for recruitment must adhere to several obligations that align with GDPR requirements for automated decision-making and profiling:

1. Transparency and Notification Obligations

  • Inform candidates and employees that they are subject to a high-risk AI system before deployment.
  • Provide clear information about the system’s purpose, capabilities, and limitations.
  • Ensure compliance with GDPR transparency requirements, including the right to information, access, and contest automated decisions.

2. Human Oversight Obligations

  • Assign trained personnel with sufficient authority to oversee the AI system.
  • Ensure they can interpret outputs and intervene or suspend the system if necessary.
  • Maintain active and informed oversight rather than a formalistic approach.

3. Data Quality and Bias Mitigation Obligations

  • Input data must be relevant, representative, and mitigate bias at the deployment stage, which may necessitate internal audits or validation procedures.
  • Conduct bias audits to ensure data does not lead to discriminatory outcomes.
  • Align with GDPR principles of data minimization and accuracy.

4. Technical and Organizational Measures Obligations

  • Use the system only as per the provider’s instructions (violating this could result in qualifying the deployer as a provider).
  • Implement safeguards to prevent misuse or unintended consequences.
  • Suspend operation if the system poses a risk or malfunctions, and inform the provider, distributor, and relevant market surveillance authority.

5. Recordkeeping and Monitoring Obligations

  • Maintain logs of system operations for at least six months (if logs are under the deployer’s control).
  • Continuously monitor performance to detect anomalies or risks and inform providers.
  • Cooperate with market surveillance authorities and provide documentation upon request.

6. Impact Assessment Obligations

  • Before first use, perform a fundamental rights impact assessment as part of the data protection impact assessment.
  • The deployer may rely on previously conducted fundamental rights impact assessments or existing assessments carried out by the provider.

7. AI Literacy and Training Obligations

  • Ensure a sufficient level of AI literacy among staff and other persons dealing with the operation and use of AI systems.
  • Provide adequate training for all staff involved in AI operations.

Respecting Candidate Rights under GDPR

Deployers must uphold candidates’ rights under the GDPR, particularly those in Article 22, which protects individuals against being subject to decisions based solely on automated processing. Where such processing is permitted, candidates must be guaranteed:

  • The right to human intervention.
  • The right to express their point of view.
  • The right to contest a decision.

These safeguards are especially critical in recruitment, where AI-driven decisions can significantly affect individuals’ careers and livelihoods.

High-risk AI systems have the potential to transform recruitment by streamlining processes and supporting better decisions. However, this potential can only be realized if organizations apply AI technology responsibly in line with the GDPR and AI Act. Compliance not only protects candidate rights and reduces legal risks but also builds trust in AI-powered hiring.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...