AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

Government’s AI Framework: A Shift Towards Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India is set to introduce a “technical secretariat” aimed at coordinating AI policies across various government departments. This initiative marks a significant departure from previous proposals suggesting the establishment of a dedicated regulatory body for the AI sector.

Context and Background

Historically, several government entities, including the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, the Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister (EAC-PM), and the Niti Aayog, have advocated for a statutory authority to oversee and regulate AI technologies. However, the new framework, as reported, will house the secretariat within the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), positioning it as a technical advisory body without the enforcement or regulatory powers typical of conventional regulators.

Framework Details

Minister of Electronics and Information Technology, Ashwani Vaishnaw, indicated that the framework is expected to be released by September 28, 2025. Its goals include:

  • Clearly defining the boundaries of AI safety
  • Establishing response mechanisms for situations where AI may pose risks to humans
  • Implementing checks and balances on the rapid adoption of AI technologies

Role of the Technical Secretariat

The technical secretariat is designed to:

  • Develop metrics and common frameworks, including measurement standards for environmental impact, data provenance, and security
  • Assess risks associated with AI technologies regarding consumer and societal impacts, covering areas such as antitrust, online safety, and data governance
  • Collaborate with industries to label AI-generated media and maintain an AI-incident database to record real-world problems

Furthermore, the secretariat may act as a coordination focal point for a larger, permanent inter-ministerial group. This group will consist of officials from various departments, including MeitY, the Department of Science and Technology, and key regulators like the Reserve Bank of India and the Securities and Exchange Board of India. Its primary objective will be to foster a comprehensive understanding of the AI ecosystem and streamline regulatory efforts across different sectors.

Contrasting Previous Proposals

This move towards a technical secretariat starkly contrasts earlier suggestions for establishing a dedicated regulatory body. In July 2023, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India had proposed the creation of an Artificial Intelligence and Data Authority of India (AIDAI) to oversee AI regulations and responsible usage. Additionally, a December report by EAC-PM member Sanjeev Sanyal emphasized the need for an agile regulatory body with a broad mandate capable of swift responses to technological advancements.

In summary, the government’s shift towards a technical secretariat reflects a strategic approach to managing AI governance, focusing on coordination and guidance rather than enforcement, aiming for a balanced integration of AI technologies into society.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...