AI Governance: Prioritizing Human Rights in an Automated World

AI Governance and Human Rights

As rapid advances in AI continue to evolve, global leaders are increasingly confronted with pressing questions regarding power, accountability, and the protection of fundamental freedoms in an automated world.

Key Discussions at the Internet Governance Forum 2025

During the Internet Governance Forum 2025 held in Lillestrøm, Norway, a pivotal session highlighted the launch of the Freedom Online Coalition’s (FOC) updated Joint Statement on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights. This statement, which is supported by 21 countries and counting, delineates a vision for human-centric AI governance grounded in international human rights law.

Participants from various sectors—including governments, civil society, and the tech industry—gathered to stress the urgent necessity for a multistakeholder approach to address the real and present risks that AI poses to rights such as privacy, freedom of expression, and democratic participation.

Interconnectedness of Human Rights and Security

Ambassador Ernst Noorman of the Netherlands emphasized that human rights and security must be viewed as interconnected. He cautioned that unregulated AI use could destabilize societies instead of providing protection, referencing the Netherlands’ own experiences with biased welfare algorithms.

Moreover, panellists including Germany’s Cyber Ambassador Maria Adebahr highlighted the alarming trend of AI being weaponized for transnational repression. Adebahr reiterated Germany’s commitment by doubling funding for the FOC.

The Role of Citizens and the Private Sector

Ghana’s cybersecurity chief, Divine Salese Agbeti, pointed out that the misuse of AI is not restricted to governments; citizens have also exploited this technology for manipulation and deception.

From the private sector, Microsoft’s Dr. Erika Moret presented the company’s comprehensive approach to embedding human rights in AI. This includes ethical design, impact assessments, and a refusal to engage in high-risk applications such as facial recognition in authoritarian contexts. Moret underscored the company’s adherence to UN guiding principles and the necessity for transparency, fairness, and inclusivity.

Global Frameworks and Calls to Action

The session also brought attention to essential global frameworks like the EU AI Act and the Council of Europe’s Framework Convention, advocating for their widespread adoption as critical tools in managing AI’s global impact. The discussion culminated in a shared call to action, urging governments to leverage regulatory tools and procurement power to uphold human rights standards in AI. Concurrently, the private sector and civil society are encouraged to advocate for accountability and inclusion.

The FOC’s statement remains open for new endorsements, serving as a foundational text in the ongoing endeavor to align the future of AI with the fundamental rights of all people.

More Insights

Harnessing Generative AI for Enhanced Risk and Compliance in 2025

In 2025, the demand for Generative AI in risk and compliance certification is surging as organizations face complex regulatory landscapes and increasing threats. This certification equips...

Building Sustainable Generative AI: Mitigating Carbon Emissions

Generative AI is revolutionizing industries, but it comes with a significant environmental cost due to carbon emissions from extensive compute resources. As the demand for large-scale models grows...

AI Regulation: Balancing Innovation and Oversight

Experts discuss the implications of the recently passed H.R. 1, which would pause state and local regulations on artificial intelligence for ten years. The article examines the benefits and drawbacks...

AI Governance in India: Shaping the Future of Technology

This article examines the evolving landscape of AI governance in India, highlighting both the initiatives aimed at promoting AI adoption and the regulatory frameworks being developed to manage...

AI’s Shadow: Exposing and Addressing Harms Against Women and Girls

AI's rapid advancement presents risks, especially for vulnerable populations targeted by cyber-harassment, hate speech, and impersonation. AI systems can amplify biases and be exploited to harm...

AI Readiness Framework for the Pharmaceutical Industry

This article presents an AI readiness assessment framework tailored for the pharmaceutical industry, emphasizing the importance of aligning AI initiatives with regulatory standards and ethical...

AI as a Strategic Partner in Governance

The UAE has announced that a National Artificial Intelligence System will become a non-voting member of all federal and government company boards, marking a significant shift in governance. This...

New Code of Practice for AI Compliance Set for 2025

The European Commission announced that a code of practice to help companies comply with the EU's artificial intelligence rules may only be implemented by the end of 2025. This delay follows calls from...

New Code of Practice for AI Compliance Set for 2025

The European Commission announced that a code of practice to help companies comply with the EU's artificial intelligence rules may only be implemented by the end of 2025. This delay follows calls from...