AI Governance in a Shifting Regulatory Landscape

AI Governance Remains Critical Despite Political Pendulum Swings

As businesses increasingly rely on AI and generative AI for myriad applications, a new body of “AI law” is forming, and some legal requirements are now in effect. AI governance has become a mandatory compliance function that organizations must prioritize immediately rather than postponing until next quarter or next year.

The Patchwork of AI Law

The landscape of AI law is complex and varies widely across jurisdictions. Some regions are enacting new regulations, while others are retracting existing ones. As the political atmosphere shifts, regulatory retrenchment has emerged as a key theme in 2025.

Hardline AI regulatory regimes that previously dominated headlines are now being scaled back. For instance, at the federal level in the U.S., the Trump administration has undone several Biden-era AI executive orders, leading federal agencies to recalibrate their enforcement priorities. Observers note that agencies such as the FTC and SEC are expected to focus primarily on clear cases of fraud rather than pursuing broader or more innovative regulatory actions.

State-Level Developments

At the state level, the Colorado AI Act is currently under scrutiny for potential amendments, including a bill introduced in April 2025. In addition, recent vetoes of high-profile AI bills by the governors of California and Virginia highlight the ongoing tensions in AI legislation. The U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee has proposed a 10-year moratorium on enforcing state AI laws in a recent draft budget reconciliation bill.

Meanwhile, across the Atlantic, the EU Commission has withdrawn the draft AI Liability Directive and is reportedly considering amendments to the EU AI Act to ease certain requirements.

Emergence of New Regulations

Despite the apparent pullback in certain regulations, the realm of AI governance is not stagnant. Newly enacted state laws in the U.S., particularly in California, Illinois, New York, and Utah, address critical issues such as:

  • Algorithmic discrimination and automated decision-making
  • Disclosure of AI usage
  • Impersonation, digital replicas, and deepfakes
  • Watermarking of AI-generated content
  • Data privacy and biometric data

State attorneys general have reiterated their commitment to enforcing existing laws against unlawful uses of AI, emphasizing that AI regulation remains a pressing concern. Furthermore, the ongoing AI “copyright war” continues to evolve, as various lawsuits in the U.S. and beyond test the boundaries of copyright infringement and fair use in relation to AI training and outputs.

The EU AI Act

Notably, the first requirements of the EU AI Act went into effect in February 2025. Companies utilizing AI within the EU are now subject to an “AI literacy” requirement, mandating measures to ensure a sufficient level of AI literacy among employees or individuals operating or using AI systems. The extraterritorial nature of the AI Act means it also applies to U.S. companies that use AI systems within the EU or produce outputs intended for use in the EU.

Mandatory employee training regarding the responsible use of AI is now a crucial aspect for compliance.

Conclusion

In summary, while there may be a trend towards softening AI regulation in some areas, this is not a universal truth. The importance of enterprise AI governance cannot be overstated. New “AI law” requirements are being implemented, with others on the horizon. Regulatory bodies, state attorneys general, and plaintiffs are keen to apply existing laws to emerging technologies. Additionally, organizations must be mindful of potential self-inflicted issues, such as data leakage, along with the reputational and public relations risks tied to AI-related missteps.

Fortunately, there are common threads within the complex landscape of AI regulation. Established guidance, such as the NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001:2023, offers valuable insights for responsible AI governance. These frameworks not only assist in compliance but may also provide statutory safe harbors or affirmative defenses under laws like the Colorado AI Act. Leveraging these resources is essential for organizations in navigating the evolving AI landscape.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...