AI Governance Gap: C-Suite Confidence vs. Consumer Concerns

AI Adoption Surges Ahead of Governance

Recent findings reveal a significant disconnect between the confidence of C-suite executives in AI systems and the levels of governance currently in place. Despite a majority of organizations integrating AI into their initiatives, a troubling gap exists concerning the responsible controls necessary to manage these technologies effectively.

Survey Overview

A comprehensive survey conducted among 975 C-suite leaders across 21 countries in March and April 2025 has shed light on the current state of AI governance. The results indicate that while nearly 72% of firms have incorporated AI into their operations, only a third have implemented adequate responsible controls for their existing AI models.

Current Governance Landscape

The report indicates that although many organizations claim to have principles for responsible AI, they often lack enforcement. On average, companies exhibit strong governance across only three of nine critical areas, which include accountability, compliance, and security.

Disparity in Sentiment

A notable finding from the survey is the disparity between executive and consumer sentiment regarding AI deployment. On average, consumers express twice the level of concern compared to C-suite executives about adherence to responsible AI principles. Specifically, only 14% of CEOs believe that their AI systems comply with relevant regulations, in contrast to 29% of other C-suite leaders.

This concern extends to issues surrounding the accountability of organizations for negative AI use, with 58% of consumers feeling that companies do not hold themselves accountable, compared to only 23% of executives. Similarly, 52% of consumers worry about organizational compliance with AI policies, whereas just 23% of executives share this concern.

Future Adoption of AI Technologies

Despite the existing governance gap, nearly all C-suite respondents anticipate adopting emerging AI technologies within the next year. A striking 76% of executives report currently using or planning to use agentic AI, although only 56% fully understand the associated risks. This gap in understanding is even more pronounced in the use of synthetic data generation tools, where 88% of organizations utilize them, yet only 55% are aware of the related risks.

Closing the Governance Gap

The findings underscore an urgent need to close the governance gap to ensure the successful and sustainable rollout of AI tools. Implementing responsible AI strategies is essential for safeguarding operations and maintaining consumer trust.

In light of the findings, it is crucial for executives to proactively address these governance issues by formulating responsible strategies to mitigate AI risks. Transparency about organizational use and protection of AI technologies is vital for building brand trust among consumers.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...