AI Governance Gap: C-Suite Confidence vs. Consumer Concerns

AI Adoption Surges Ahead of Governance

Recent findings reveal a significant disconnect between the confidence of C-suite executives in AI systems and the levels of governance currently in place. Despite a majority of organizations integrating AI into their initiatives, a troubling gap exists concerning the responsible controls necessary to manage these technologies effectively.

Survey Overview

A comprehensive survey conducted among 975 C-suite leaders across 21 countries in March and April 2025 has shed light on the current state of AI governance. The results indicate that while nearly 72% of firms have incorporated AI into their operations, only a third have implemented adequate responsible controls for their existing AI models.

Current Governance Landscape

The report indicates that although many organizations claim to have principles for responsible AI, they often lack enforcement. On average, companies exhibit strong governance across only three of nine critical areas, which include accountability, compliance, and security.

Disparity in Sentiment

A notable finding from the survey is the disparity between executive and consumer sentiment regarding AI deployment. On average, consumers express twice the level of concern compared to C-suite executives about adherence to responsible AI principles. Specifically, only 14% of CEOs believe that their AI systems comply with relevant regulations, in contrast to 29% of other C-suite leaders.

This concern extends to issues surrounding the accountability of organizations for negative AI use, with 58% of consumers feeling that companies do not hold themselves accountable, compared to only 23% of executives. Similarly, 52% of consumers worry about organizational compliance with AI policies, whereas just 23% of executives share this concern.

Future Adoption of AI Technologies

Despite the existing governance gap, nearly all C-suite respondents anticipate adopting emerging AI technologies within the next year. A striking 76% of executives report currently using or planning to use agentic AI, although only 56% fully understand the associated risks. This gap in understanding is even more pronounced in the use of synthetic data generation tools, where 88% of organizations utilize them, yet only 55% are aware of the related risks.

Closing the Governance Gap

The findings underscore an urgent need to close the governance gap to ensure the successful and sustainable rollout of AI tools. Implementing responsible AI strategies is essential for safeguarding operations and maintaining consumer trust.

In light of the findings, it is crucial for executives to proactively address these governance issues by formulating responsible strategies to mitigate AI risks. Transparency about organizational use and protection of AI technologies is vital for building brand trust among consumers.

More Insights

AI Governance Start-Ups Surge Amid Growing Demand for Ethical Solutions

As the demand for AI technologies surges, so does the need for governance solutions to ensure they operate ethically and securely. The global AI governance industry is projected to grow significantly...

10-Year Ban on State AI Laws: Implications and Insights

The US House of Representatives has approved a budget package that includes a 10-year moratorium on enforcing state AI laws, which has sparked varying opinions among experts. Many argue that this...

AI in the Courts: Insights from 500 Cases

Courts around the world are already regulating artificial intelligence (AI) through various disputes involving automated decisions and data processing. The AI on Trial project highlights 500 cases...

Bridging the Gap in Responsible AI Implementation

Responsible AI is becoming a critical business necessity, especially as companies in the Asia-Pacific region face rising risks associated with emergent AI technologies. While nearly half of APAC...

Leading AI Governance: The Legal Imperative for Safe Innovation

In a recent interview, Brooke Johnson, Chief Legal Counsel at Ivanti, emphasizes the critical role of legal teams in AI governance, advocating for cross-functional collaboration to ensure safe and...

AI Regulations: Balancing Innovation and Safety

The recent passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act by the House of Representatives includes a provision that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence for ten years. This has...

Balancing Compliance and Innovation in Financial Services

Financial services companies face challenges in navigating rapidly evolving AI regulations that differ by jurisdiction, which can hinder innovation. The need for compliance is critical, as any misstep...

Avoiding AI Governance Pitfalls

As AI-infused tools become increasingly prevalent in enterprises, the importance of effective AI governance has grown. However, many businesses are falling short in their governance efforts, often...

North America’s Struggle with AI Compliance Adoption

A recent report reveals that North American firms are lagging behind their EMEA counterparts in AI adoption for compliance, with 56.3% hesitant to embrace the technology. In contrast, over 70% of EMEA...