India’s AI market is projected to grow significantly, driven by government initiatives and a young, tech-savvy workforce. However, the rapid expansion of AI also raises concerns regarding ethical deployment and the need for a comprehensive regulatory framework.
The article examines the implications of India’s Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, which emphasizes consent-centric data governance, on the development of artificial intelligence (AI). It highlights the challenges of balancing individual privacy rights with the data needs of AI systems, particularly in sectors requiring curated datasets.
The European Commission is investigating Google’s AI Overviews feature to determine if it violates EU digital laws, as publishers express concerns over competition and visibility. This feature, which summarizes information from across the web, may be sidelining original content creators by keeping users within Google’s ecosystem.
The Model Control Plane (MCP) is an emerging architectural pattern that centralizes governance, reliability, and visibility across the AI model lifecycle. By orchestrating policy enforcement and observability, MCP is crucial for enterprises aiming to build responsible AI systems at scale.
The EU AI Act may impact UK-based businesses that use AI solutions, even if they operate entirely outside the EU. Companies could be affected if they export AI systems or their results to the EU, and they might find themselves bound to certain obligations outlined by AI tool providers.
The Insurtech sector is increasingly intersecting with AI regulations, particularly regarding the classification of AI systems as “high-risk.” Various jurisdictions, such as Colorado and the European Union, have established laws that impose stricter obligations on companies deploying AI models deemed high-risk, especially those that make consequential decisions in the insurance domain.
The EU AI Act, which defines four levels of risk for AI systems, aims to promote the uptake of human-centric and trustworthy AI while protecting fundamental rights. As machine-builders begin to integrate AI into their systems, compliance with this legislation will be crucial, particularly for high-risk AI systems employed as safety components.
On April 3, 2025, the OMB released two revised policies aimed at guiding federal agencies in the use and procurement of artificial intelligence, promoting a pro-innovation approach. These policies replace previous memos and emphasize reducing bureaucratic barriers while ensuring transparency and accountability in AI deployment.
The European Commission is inviting stakeholders to provide input on upcoming guidelines for general-purpose AI (GPAI) models as part of the AI Act. This consultation aims to clarify key concepts and support compliance, with feedback due by May 22, 2025.
As generative AI technology advances, businesses are experimenting with AI agents that can autonomously make decisions and interact with critical systems. However, this autonomy poses risks if not paired with proper AI governance and security measures, as unsanctioned use could lead to data leaks and compliance violations.
Take the first steps in your transformation towards international AI compliance.
Our expert sales team is here to answer your questions, just leave your email and we’ll get in touch.
