Civil society groups are raising concerns over the lack of guidance from the European Commission on banned AI systems as the enforcement date for the AI Act approaches on February 2. The Act includes provisions for prohibiting certain AI systems, but exceptions for public interest could lead to potential abuses, according to critics.
As the February 2nd deadline approaches, organizations must align with the EU AI Act’s requirements, focusing on AI literacy and compliance to avoid legal pitfalls. This proactive approach not only ensures adherence to regulations but also fosters a culture of responsible AI use.
The European regulation on artificial intelligence (AI) came into force on August 1, 2024, aiming to promote responsible development and deployment of AI within the EU. It establishes clear requirements for developers and deployers based on specific risk assessments associated with AI technologies.
The European regulation on AI, known as the AI Act, is the world’s first comprehensive legislation aimed at governing the development, marketing, and use of artificial intelligence systems. It introduces a risk-based approach, categorizing AI systems into four levels of risk to ensure the protection of health, safety, and fundamental rights.
The AI legislation is the first comprehensive legal framework addressing AI risks, positioning Europe as a global leader in this field. It aims to ensure trustworthy AI by establishing clear requirements and obligations for developers and deployers of AI technologies.
The European Regulation on Artificial Intelligence (AI Act), adopted by the Council of the European Union on May 21, 2024, aims to ensure the ethical and safe use of AI systems within the EU. It establishes a risk-based approach to regulate AI technologies, imposing various obligations on providers and users based on the identified risk levels.
The document outlines the implementation timeline of the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act, detailing key dates and responsibilities for member states and the Commission. It highlights significant phases of the law’s application, including the gradual enforcement of regulations and deadlines for compliance.
The Texas Responsible AI Governance Act (TRAIGA) aims to impose strict regulations on AI systems to address algorithmic bias, but its bureaucratic approach may create more problems than it solves. By prioritizing compliance over meaningful outcomes, TRAIGA risks obscuring progress in fairness and accountability in AI governance.
Texas’s proposed AI law, the Texas Responsible AI Governance Act, introduces strict regulations that could hinder innovation in the state. While aiming to address risks associated with artificial intelligence, the legislation may impose heavy burdens on companies, potentially jeopardizing significant projects like the $500 billion Stargate Project.
Take the first steps in your transformation towards international AI compliance.
Our expert sales team is here to answer your questions, just leave your email and we’ll get in touch.
