Understanding Compliance for Risky AI Systems in the Workplace

Risky AI Systems: An Overview

The emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has brought about significant advancements, but it also poses substantial risks. Understanding these risks is crucial for businesses and employers who utilize AI systems. This article delves into the implications of the EU AI Act, a groundbreaking piece of legislation that regulates AI based on its risk levels.

The EU AI Act: A World First

On February 2, 2025, the EU AI Act came into effect, marking the first legislative effort globally to regulate AI systems. The Act categorizes AI uses into various risk levels—from minimal risk to unacceptable risk. This classification aims to enhance safety, transparency, and sustainability while preventing discriminatory practices in AI applications.

Organizations need to be proactive in ensuring compliance to avoid potential fines and reputational damage.

Scope of the Act: Who Needs to Comply?

The Act applies not only to AI suppliers within the EU but also to providers and users located outside the EU if their AI outputs are utilized within the EU. For instance, using an AI recruitment tool in the UK for hiring within the EU falls under the Act’s jurisdiction.

Risk Categories Defined

AI uses are classified into different risk categories:

  • Minimal Risk: Most AI systems currently available in the EU market.
  • Limited Risk: Subject to light-touch obligations.
  • High Risk: Stricter regulations are imposed.
  • Unacceptable Risk: Banned outright due to significant threats to users and society.

The maximum penalty for non-compliance can reach €35 million or up to 7% of a firm’s total annual turnover.

High Risk AI Systems

High-risk AI systems include applications that affect fundamental rights, such as:

  • Biometric data categorization (e.g., AI in CCTV).
  • Education and training tools (e.g., detecting erratic student behavior).
  • Employment-related AI (e.g., HR decision-making and recruitment).
  • Justice administration (e.g., AI in alternative dispute resolution).

These systems must demonstrate a significant risk of harm to health, safety, or fundamental rights to qualify as high risk.

Unacceptable Risk AI Systems

As of February 2, 2025, certain AI systems have been categorized as unacceptable risk and are thus prohibited. Examples include:

  • Systems that socially score individuals.
  • Emotion recognition technologies in workplaces and schools.
  • Biometric categorization systems that infer sensitive attributes.

Action Steps for Employers

Employers must take immediate steps if their business falls within the Act’s scope:

  • Audits: Evaluate current AI systems for compliance with risk categories.
  • Policies: Establish governance policies to guide responsible AI usage.
  • Training: Educate employees about AI risks and responsibilities.
  • Supplier Compliance: Ensure third-party AI providers adhere to the Act.

Proactive compliance with the Act will help maintain a culture focused on people, mitigate substantial fines, and protect the organization’s reputation.

More Insights

CII Advocates for Strong AI Accountability in Financial Services

The Chartered Insurance Institute (CII) has urged for clear accountability frameworks and a skills strategy for the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in financial services. They emphasize the...

Regulating AI in APAC MedTech: Current Trends and Future Directions

The regulatory landscape for AI-enabled MedTech in the Asia Pacific region is still developing, with existing frameworks primarily governing other technologies. While countries like China, Japan, and...

New York’s AI Legislation: Key Changes Employers Must Know

In early 2025, New York proposed the NY AI Act and the AI Consumer Protection Act to regulate the use of artificial intelligence, particularly addressing algorithmic discrimination in employment...

Managing AI Risks: Effective Frameworks for Safe Implementation

This article discusses the importance of AI risk management frameworks to mitigate potential risks associated with artificial intelligence systems. It highlights various types of risks, including...

Essential Insights on the EU Artificial Intelligence Act for Tech Companies

The European Union has introduced the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), which aims to manage the risks and opportunities associated with AI technologies across Europe. This landmark regulation...

South Korea’s Landmark AI Basic Act: A New Era of Regulation

South Korea has established itself as a leader in AI regulation in Asia with the introduction of the AI Basic Act, which creates a comprehensive legal framework for artificial intelligence. This...

EU AI Act and DORA: Mastering Compliance in Financial Services

The EU AI Act and DORA are reshaping how financial entities manage AI risk by introducing new layers of compliance that demand transparency, accountability, and quantifiable risk assessments...

AI Governance: Bridging the Transatlantic Divide

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping economies, societies, and global governance, presenting both significant opportunities and risks. This chapter examines the divergent approaches of...

EU’s Ambitious Plan to Boost AI Development

The EU Commission is launching a new strategy to reduce barriers for the deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) across Europe, aiming to enhance the region's competitiveness on a global scale. The...