Kazakhstan’s Bold Step Towards Human-Centric AI Regulation

Kazakhstan’s Ambitious AI Regulation: A Human-Centric Approach

With its draft ‘Law on Artificial Intelligence’ approved in May, Kazakhstan is setting an ambitious course to regulate AI with a focus on human-centric principles. This initiative comes as the Central Asian nation seeks to establish a framework that not only aligns with global trends but also reflects its own national values.

Reflecting Global Trends

The head of the Centre for Public Legislation and Public Administration, Shoplan Saimova, stated, “The bill reflects major global trends in AI regulation.” The EU’s AI Act serves as a model, and Kazakhstan aims to lead rather than follow, creating a system that builds trust between humans and algorithms while safeguarding public interests.

Broad Consultation for Development

The development of this law involved extensive consultation with stakeholders, including lawmakers, tech experts, and industry representatives. This collaborative approach highlights a robust cross-sector backing for the initiative, which aims to regulate AI across various societal domains.

Core Principles of the Legislation

The draft legislation is built on fundamental principles such as:

  • Fairness
  • Legality
  • Accountability
  • Human well-being

Notably, the law prohibits unauthorized data collection and considers imposing criminal liability for significant misuse of AI systems that pose risks to the public.

Impact on Workforce and Training

This legislation could reshape the workforce in Kazakhstan. Experts emphasize the urgent necessity to retrain IT professionals, especially in areas like AI system design and digital ethics. The government recognizes that a responsible approach to AI can foster economic growth while prioritizing human rights.

Legal Framework and Human Rights Concerns

Igor Rogov, the head of Kazakhstan’s human rights commission, has raised important questions regarding accountability in AI systems. Key concerns include:

  • Who is responsible when AI causes harm?
  • Who owns content generated by AI?
  • How can we prevent AI from being utilized for fraud or deception?

The judiciary in Kazakhstan has begun integrating AI to draft decisions in civil cases, indicating the early stages of AI adoption in public institutions while ensuring judges retain final authority.

Challenges and Regulatory Gaps

A recent academic study conducted by five Kazakh scholars offers a comparative legal analysis of Kazakhstan’s draft AI legislation and the EU’s AI Act. While Kazakhstan adopts several elements of a risk-based approach, the framework is found to be lacking in:

  • Clear risk classification systems
  • Requirements for algorithmic transparency
  • Robust personal data protections
  • Strong institutional enforcement mechanisms

The authors of the study suggest that Kazakhstan should selectively adopt components of the EU model, adjusting them to fit the national legal framework. Establishing clear regulatory standards and enhancing institutional capacity are deemed necessary for ensuring compliance.

Transparency and Public Education

The unique challenges posed by Kazakhstan’s media landscape and multilingual environment necessitate that transparency and accountability efforts are supported by public education and sufficient technical infrastructure.

Conclusion: Towards a Responsible AI Ecosystem

While the legal efforts to regulate AI in Kazakhstan are promising, further work is needed. By drawing insights from the EU’s experiences, Kazakhstan can strive to establish a responsible and trusted AI ecosystem—one that not only protects citizens’ rights but also attracts global partnerships and investment.

More Insights

AI Readiness Framework for the Pharmaceutical Industry

This article presents an AI readiness assessment framework tailored for the pharmaceutical industry, emphasizing the importance of aligning AI initiatives with regulatory standards and ethical...

AI as a Strategic Partner in Governance

The UAE has announced that a National Artificial Intelligence System will become a non-voting member of all federal and government company boards, marking a significant shift in governance. This...

New Code of Practice for AI Compliance Set for 2025

The European Commission announced that a code of practice to help companies comply with the EU's artificial intelligence rules may only be implemented by the end of 2025. This delay follows calls from...

New Code of Practice for AI Compliance Set for 2025

The European Commission announced that a code of practice to help companies comply with the EU's artificial intelligence rules may only be implemented by the end of 2025. This delay follows calls from...

AI Governance: The Key to Successful Enterprise Implementation

Artificial intelligence is at a critical juncture, with many enterprise AI initiatives failing to reach production and exposing organizations to significant risks. Effective AI governance is essential...

AI Code Compliance: Companies May Get a Grace Period

The commission is considering providing a grace period for companies that agree to comply with the new AI Code. This initiative aims to facilitate a smoother transition for businesses adapting to the...

Texas Enacts Groundbreaking AI Governance Law

On June 22, 2025, Texas enacted the Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act, making it the second state to implement comprehensive AI legislation. The act establishes a framework for the...

Texas Enacts Groundbreaking AI Governance Law

On June 22, 2025, Texas enacted the Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act, making it the second state to implement comprehensive AI legislation. The act establishes a framework for the...

Laws in Europe Combatting Deepfakes

Denmark has introduced a law that grants individuals copyright over their likenesses to combat deepfakes, making it illegal to share such content without consent. Other European countries are also...