The essay discusses the need for inclusive AI practices and the importance of reviewing evidence from diverse public voices to ensure that marginalized groups are represented in AI decision-making. It emphasizes that current AI assurance frameworks are inadequate and calls for a re-evaluation of how evidence is gathered and utilized in the AI field.
Article 5 (1)(b) of the EU AI Act focuses on protecting vulnerable groups from being exploited by AI systems, particularly those who may have limited ability to recognize or resist manipulation. This provision aims to ensure that industries such as advertising, healthcare, and finance design their AI systems responsibly to avoid targeting and manipulating individuals in vulnerable situations.
Amnesty International’s report highlights that Denmark’s welfare authority risks discriminating against marginalized groups through its use of AI tools for social benefits fraud investigations. The sweeping surveillance practices have eroded individual privacy and created an atmosphere of fear among those targeted by these algorithms.
Take the first steps in your transformation towards international AI compliance.
Our expert sales team is here to answer your questions, just leave your email and we’ll get in touch.
