The article discusses the recent shift in the U.S. government’s approach to artificial intelligence regulation, moving from a focus on safety and multi-stakeholder collaboration to prioritizing national security and innovation. This change raises concerns about the potential neglect of critical issues such as bias and discrimination in AI, as the tech industry gains more influence over policy decisions.
The essay discusses the need for inclusive AI practices and the importance of reviewing evidence from diverse public voices to ensure that marginalized groups are represented in AI decision-making. It emphasizes that current AI assurance frameworks are inadequate and calls for a re-evaluation of how evidence is gathered and utilized in the AI field.
Article 5 (1)(b) of the EU AI Act focuses on protecting vulnerable groups from being exploited by AI systems, particularly those who may have limited ability to recognize or resist manipulation. This provision aims to ensure that industries such as advertising, healthcare, and finance design their AI systems responsibly to avoid targeting and manipulating individuals in vulnerable situations.
Amnesty International’s report highlights that Denmark’s welfare authority risks discriminating against marginalized groups through its use of AI tools for social benefits fraud investigations. The sweeping surveillance practices have eroded individual privacy and created an atmosphere of fear among those targeted by these algorithms.