The EU AI Act is the first comprehensive legal framework regulating artificial intelligence, ensuring that AI systems in the EU are safe, transparent, and ethical. It classifies AI systems into four risk categories, imposing stricter compliance requirements on high-risk systems used in sensitive areas like healthcare and law enforcement.
On June 2, the Texas legislature passed the Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act, making it the most comprehensive piece of AI governance legislation to date. If signed into law, the bill will impose significant regulations on the development and deployment of AI systems, with provisions aimed at ensuring ethical use and protecting consumer rights.
The article discusses the significant challenges that companies face regarding regulatory compliance in the context of AI adoption, particularly in Europe. It highlights issues such as the difficulty of interpreting regulations, risk avoidance, and the need for human oversight, which can slow down innovation and hinder the deployment of AI solutions.
The European Union (EU) is at a pivotal moment in its approach to artificial intelligence (AI), balancing the need for robust regulation with the drive for innovation to remain competitive against the United States and China. As it pivots toward a more innovation-focused strategy, concerns arise over potential risks to democratic safeguards and the EU’s credibility as a leader in ethical AI governance.
Since 2016, over thirty countries have enacted laws addressing Artificial Intelligence, and discussions about AI regulation are intensifying globally in 2025. UNESCO’s consultation paper outlines nine regulatory approaches to AI, ranging from light-touch measures to more coercive regulations, highlighting the need for a balanced framework in AI governance.
House Republicans have proposed a 10-year moratorium on state AI laws in response to concerns from tech companies about the growing complexity of state regulations on AI and data privacy. This proposal is part of a larger federal effort to create a unified framework for data privacy while addressing the needs of big tech vendors.
The final version of the EU’s General Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice has been delayed, with publication now expected by August. This delay raises concerns about the timeline for the EU AI Act’s provisions, which are set to come into force on 2 August.
States are rapidly enacting individual laws to regulate artificial intelligence, resulting in a fragmented legal landscape that could hinder innovation and complicate compliance for companies. Congress is urged to establish a consistent national framework to preempt these state laws and maintain U.S. leadership in AI.
Philips’ Chief Innovation Officer, Shez Partovi, emphasizes the need for the EU AI Act to ensure patient safety while fostering innovation in the AI medical device sector. He expresses concerns that overlapping regulatory requirements could hinder the growth of smaller companies and urges for a balance that promotes trust without stifling innovation.
The article discusses the progress of the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) and the implementation of the Artificial Intelligence Act, highlighting significant decisions and ongoing enforcement actions. It emphasizes the challenges faced during the stakeholder consultation process for the upcoming General-Purpose AI Code of Practice.
Take the first steps in your transformation towards international AI compliance.
Our expert sales team is here to answer your questions, just leave your email and we’ll get in touch.
