On July 10, 2025, the European Commission released a nearly final version of the General-Purpose AI Code of Practice, which serves as a voluntary compliance mechanism leading up to the implementation of the AI Act’s GPAI provider obligations. The Code offers practical guidance for AI providers to meet obligations related to transparency, copyright compliance, and risk mitigation.
The EU AI Act introduces a comprehensive regulation for high-risk AI systems, emphasizing a mandatory Risk Management System (RMS) to proactively manage risks throughout the AI lifecycle. This iterative process requires continuous identification, assessment, and mitigation of risks, ensuring the safety and fundamental rights of users are upheld.
As AI systems become integral to various industries, the EU AI Act introduces a comprehensive regulatory framework with stringent obligations based on four defined risk tiers. This guide explores AI classification’s foundational concepts and offers practical steps for organizations to streamline compliance and mitigate regulatory risks.
As AI systems become integral to various industries, the EU AI Act introduces a comprehensive regulatory framework with stringent obligations based on four defined risk tiers. This guide explores AI classification’s foundational concepts and offers practical steps for organizations to streamline compliance and mitigate regulatory risks.
The European Commission has released a voluntary Code of Practice for general-purpose AI models to help industry comply with the AI Act’s obligations on safety, transparency, and copyright. The AI Office invites providers to sign the Code, which will be publicly listed on 1 August 2025, ahead of the Act’s obligations taking effect.
The European Union’s AI Act is facing significant backlash due to its rushed implementation, which critics argue could stifle innovation and impose heavy compliance burdens. Despite industry calls for a delay, the European Commission remains committed to the strict timeline, raising concerns about the potential impact on Europe’s competitiveness in the global AI landscape.
The European Union’s AI Act is facing significant backlash due to its rushed implementation, which critics argue could stifle innovation and impose heavy compliance burdens. Despite industry calls for a delay, the European Commission remains committed to the strict timeline, raising concerns about the potential impact on Europe’s competitiveness in the global AI landscape.
As the enforcement date for parts of the EU’s AI Act approaches, companies are calling for a delay due to the lack of guidance on compliance. Some politicians support this request, emphasizing the need for clearer regulations to avoid stifling innovation.
The European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act, often referred to as the ‘new GDPR’, has come into effect, marking a significant shift towards the regulation of AI technologies. This comprehensive legislation aims to ensure that AI systems are safe, respect fundamental rights, and promote trustworthy innovation within the EU market.
The Swedish Prime Minister has called for a pause in the European Union’s AI regulations, highlighting the need for further evaluation before implementing new rules. This request comes amid growing concerns about the impact of AI technologies on society and the economy.