Amid the upcoming release of the draft enforcement ordinance of the “Artificial Intelligence (AI) Framework Act,” experts emphasize the need for effective standards through industry communication to promote AI innovation in Korea. Key concerns include regulatory uncertainty and potential burdens on companies due to unclear definitions and obligations related to high-impact AI.
The European Commission has released document C(2025) 924 final, providing essential guidelines that clarify the definition of an AI system under the new EU AI Act. This document aims to ensure compliance and foster innovation while addressing the rapid proliferation of AI across various sectors.
Brazilian lawmakers have been debating how to regulate artificial intelligence, with a Senate bill recently passed that is now headed to the lower house of Congress. The legislation takes a risk-based regulatory approach but has faced significant lobbying pressure from the tech industry, leading to key carveouts that may affect its effectiveness.
France has been instrumental in lobbying for changes to the European Artificial Intelligence Act, which will allow greater surveillance capabilities for law enforcement and border authorities. These amendments raise significant concerns about privacy rights and the potential misuse of AI technologies against citizens.
The European Union’s AI Act, which aims to regulate high-risk AI systems, is set to officially ban applications deemed to pose “unacceptable risk,” including biometric categorization and emotion recognition. However, national security exemptions could allow law enforcement to bypass these bans, raising concerns about potential abuses and the protection of individual rights.
The EU AI Act aims to create a consistent legal framework for artificial intelligence development and use across member states, focusing on human-centric and trustworthy AI. This legislation has significant implications for the robotics industry, as it requires companies to comply with various risk classifications and regulations to ensure safety, transparency, and accountability.
The EU AI Act, adopted in June 2024, is the world’s first comprehensive regulation aimed at governing artificial intelligence, significantly affecting how public authorities utilize AI in administrative contexts. By requiring member states to align their laws with the Act, it not only influences national procedures but also fosters the Europeanisation of administrative law through the application of EU principles of procedural justice.
Major countries are diverging in their approaches to artificial intelligence regulation, with Australia pushing for strict oversight, the EU implementing its AI Act, and OpenAI preparing a national AI plan. This regulatory divide comes as banks and financial firms rapidly adopt AI technology, highlighting the contrasting strategies of nations regarding AI governance.
The EU AI Act introduces a risk-based regulatory framework for artificial intelligence, categorizing systems based on their potential risks. Limited-risk AI systems, which include chatbots and content generators, are subject to specific transparency obligations to ensure users are aware they are interacting with AI technology.
California’s recent veto of the Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act has raised questions about the future of AI regulation in the state. Despite support from prominent figures, the bill’s defeat highlights the challenges lawmakers face in balancing innovation with necessary safety measures.