With less than three months until the deadline, many EU member states are still undecided on which authorities will oversee compliance with the AI Act. Delays in appointing these regulators could lead to uncertainty for businesses required to comply with the new rules.
The European Commission is prepared to provide alternative solutions if technical standards for the EU’s AI Act are delayed, as the main standardization bodies have announced that the standards will now be ready in 2026 instead of August 2025. The Commission emphasizes that while these standards are not mandatory, they will significantly ease compliance efforts for providers of high-risk AI systems.
The development of technical standards for the EU’s AI Act is behind schedule, with completion now expected to extend into 2026. This delay may impact manufacturers’ ability to demonstrate compliance with the regulations aimed at ensuring the safety and trustworthiness of high-risk AI applications.
The article discusses the complex impact of tariffs and the EU AI Act on the advancement of AI and automation, highlighting how tariffs can both hinder and potentially catalyze innovation. It emphasizes that while tariffs may increase production costs and disrupt supply chains, they could also incentivize domestic innovation and investment in AI technologies.
Amid the upcoming release of the draft enforcement ordinance of the “Artificial Intelligence (AI) Framework Act,” experts emphasize the need for effective standards through industry communication to promote AI innovation in Korea. Key concerns include regulatory uncertainty and potential burdens on companies due to unclear definitions and obligations related to high-impact AI.
The European Commission has released document C(2025) 924 final, providing essential guidelines that clarify the definition of an AI system under the new EU AI Act. This document aims to ensure compliance and foster innovation while addressing the rapid proliferation of AI across various sectors.
Brazilian lawmakers have been debating how to regulate artificial intelligence, with a Senate bill recently passed that is now headed to the lower house of Congress. The legislation takes a risk-based regulatory approach but has faced significant lobbying pressure from the tech industry, leading to key carveouts that may affect its effectiveness.
France has been instrumental in lobbying for changes to the European Artificial Intelligence Act, which will allow greater surveillance capabilities for law enforcement and border authorities. These amendments raise significant concerns about privacy rights and the potential misuse of AI technologies against citizens.
The European Union’s AI Act, which aims to regulate high-risk AI systems, is set to officially ban applications deemed to pose “unacceptable risk,” including biometric categorization and emotion recognition. However, national security exemptions could allow law enforcement to bypass these bans, raising concerns about potential abuses and the protection of individual rights.
The EU AI Act aims to create a consistent legal framework for artificial intelligence development and use across member states, focusing on human-centric and trustworthy AI. This legislation has significant implications for the robotics industry, as it requires companies to comply with various risk classifications and regulations to ensure safety, transparency, and accountability.
Take the first steps in your transformation towards international AI compliance.
Our expert sales team is here to answer your questions, just leave your email and we’ll get in touch.
