The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA Europe) has cautioned EU leaders about the potential risks of implementing the AI Act without a finalized framework, stressing that critical provisions for general-purpose AI models still lack essential guidance. They warn that a rushed rollout could jeopardize the EU’s AI ambitions and hinder innovation in the sector.
Texas has enacted the Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA), which will take effect on January 1, 2026. This legislation aims to regulate AI technologies, prohibiting their use for harmful purposes and requiring transparency when AI interacts with consumers.
The EU AI Act, adopted on June 13, 2024, is the world’s first comprehensive law to regulate artificial intelligence, marking a shift from voluntary ethics to mandatory governance. It establishes a risk-based approach to AI regulation, categorizing systems based on their potential impact on fundamental rights and safety.
The European Commission has published guidance for general-purpose AI models under the AI Act, clarifying the obligations for providers and defining what constitutes a general-purpose AI model. The guidance outlines compliance expectations, particularly for advanced models posing systemic risks, with a timeline for implementation starting from August 2025.
The development of responsible Artificial Intelligence (AI) policies and overall AI strategies must occur simultaneously to ensure alignment with intended purposes and core values. Bhutan’s unique approach, grounded in the philosophy of Gross National Happiness, positions it as a noteworthy contributor to global AI governance discussions.
The European Union’s AI Act, which categorizes artificial intelligence models based on risk levels, aims to balance innovation with safety. As of August 2, compliance is mandatory for general-purpose AI models and those identified as posing systemic risks, with significant penalties for non-compliance.
On July 10, 2025, the European Commission published the final version of the General-Purpose AI Code of Practice, which aims to provide a framework for compliance with certain provisions of the EU AI Act. While adherence to the AI Code is voluntary, organizations that choose to comply can benefit from a reduced administrative burden and greater legal certainty.
Texas has enacted comprehensive AI governance laws, including the Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA) and Senate Bill 1188, which establish a framework for responsible AI use, particularly in the healthcare sector. These laws mandate transparency in AI usage and prohibit discriminatory practices, ensuring that patients are informed about AI involvement in their care.
The AI Office will soon seek third-party contractors to provide technical assistance for monitoring compliance with the EU AI Act, focusing on risks posed by general-purpose AI models. The €9,080,000 tender includes six lots addressing various systemic risks and aims to enhance ongoing risk monitoring services.
The European Union has become the first in the world to introduce comprehensive regulations on artificial intelligence through the AI Act, aimed at ensuring safe, transparent, and ethical use of AI systems. This legislation addresses both the potential benefits and risks associated with AI technologies while promoting innovation and protecting citizens’ rights.