AI governance involves establishing rules and policies to ensure responsible AI use, preventing potential risks associated with AI deployment. The EU AI Act categorizes AI systems by risk levels and outlines necessary compliance measures for companies using high-risk AI applications.
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is making progress toward AI governance through an innovation-friendly approach, but growing AI-related risks highlight the need for more binding regulations. This brief examines ASEAN’s collective efforts in AI regulation and the varying domestic strategies of its member states.
The Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA), passed on May 31, 2025, establishes disclosure requirements for AI developers and deployers while outlining prohibited uses of AI and civil penalties for violations. The law takes effect on January 1, 2026, as part of a growing trend among states to legislate on artificial intelligence.
The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA Europe) has cautioned EU leaders about the potential risks of implementing the AI Act without a finalized framework, stressing that critical provisions for general-purpose AI models still lack essential guidance. They warn that a rushed rollout could jeopardize the EU’s AI ambitions and hinder innovation in the sector.
Texas has enacted the Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA), which will take effect on January 1, 2026. This legislation aims to regulate AI technologies, prohibiting their use for harmful purposes and requiring transparency when AI interacts with consumers.
The EU AI Act, adopted on June 13, 2024, is the world’s first comprehensive law to regulate artificial intelligence, marking a shift from voluntary ethics to mandatory governance. It establishes a risk-based approach to AI regulation, categorizing systems based on their potential impact on fundamental rights and safety.
The European Commission has published guidance for general-purpose AI models under the AI Act, clarifying the obligations for providers and defining what constitutes a general-purpose AI model. The guidance outlines compliance expectations, particularly for advanced models posing systemic risks, with a timeline for implementation starting from August 2025.
The development of responsible Artificial Intelligence (AI) policies and overall AI strategies must occur simultaneously to ensure alignment with intended purposes and core values. Bhutan’s unique approach, grounded in the philosophy of Gross National Happiness, positions it as a noteworthy contributor to global AI governance discussions.
The European Union’s AI Act, which categorizes artificial intelligence models based on risk levels, aims to balance innovation with safety. As of August 2, compliance is mandatory for general-purpose AI models and those identified as posing systemic risks, with significant penalties for non-compliance.
On July 10, 2025, the European Commission published the final version of the General-Purpose AI Code of Practice, which aims to provide a framework for compliance with certain provisions of the EU AI Act. While adherence to the AI Code is voluntary, organizations that choose to comply can benefit from a reduced administrative burden and greater legal certainty.