On March 24, 2025, Virginia’s Governor vetoed House Bill 2094, which aimed to establish regulations for businesses developing “high-risk” AI systems, citing concerns over its potential to hinder innovation. This decision reflects ongoing debates about how best to regulate AI technology at both state and federal levels.
Taiwan is taking proactive measures to support the AI industry by introducing the draft AI Basic Act and amending existing laws to address challenges posed by AI technologies, such as fraud and election manipulation. The government’s comprehensive approach includes promoting AI innovation across various sectors while ensuring data governance and protecting personal privacy.
The EU AI Act aims to regulate artificial intelligence in the automotive industry by establishing compliance requirements for high-risk AI systems, particularly those involved in autonomous and automated vehicles. As the Act introduces a risk-based approach, it will significantly impact how developers and users of automotive AI must adapt to ensure safety and adherence to new standards.
AI businesses in Northern Ireland are expected to face stricter regulations compared to those in the rest of the UK, as highlighted by Dr. Barry Scannell, an expert in AI law. This situation arises from the European Commission’s proposal to apply the EU AI Act in Northern Ireland post-Brexit, potentially creating a regulatory gap between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK.
A group of MEPs has expressed serious concerns to the European Commission about proposed changes to the AI code of practice, which would make risk assessments for fundamental rights and democracy voluntary for AI system providers. They argue that this shift undermines the core principles of the AI Act, potentially allowing discriminatory content and political interference in elections.
Recent developments in Virginia and Texas indicate a shift towards more pro-innovation AI policies, as both states have rejected heavy-handed regulatory measures that could hinder technological advancement. Virginia’s Governor Youngkin vetoed a significant AI regulatory bill, while Texas is revising its approach to avoid similar pitfalls.
As the integration of quantum computing and AI accelerates, establishing global regulation is crucial to prevent misuse and ensure these technologies benefit humanity. The potential for both positive and negative outcomes underscores the urgency of creating a responsible framework for quantum AI.
The European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) is a significant legislation aimed at regulating AI systems within the EU to ensure safety, transparency, and accountability. With the Act becoming law on August 2, 2024, companies must prepare for a series of compliance deadlines over the next few years.
Governments around the world are struggling to balance the need for regulation with the rapid expansion of AI technology. While the European Union aims to establish a legal framework for AI, the U.S. adopts a more laissez-faire approach to foster innovation.
On March 4, 2025, the Irish government approved a recommendation to implement a distributed regulatory model for enforcing the EU Artificial Intelligence Act. This marks a significant step in establishing a framework for AI governance in Ireland, designating eight public bodies as national competent authorities responsible for oversight in their respective sectors.