The UK is working on new regulations to better govern software and AI in medical devices, with the MHRA focusing on principles that ensure safety and efficacy. As innovation accelerates, the MHRA has initiated programs like the AI Airlock pilot to streamline the path for AI medical devices to reach the market.
As state and local legislatures begin to craft their own AI regulations, automated decision making has become a key focus area. Laws in places like Colorado, Illinois, and New York City aim to prevent discrimination in AI systems used for significant consumer decisions.
The Artificial Intelligence (Regulation) Bill seeks to introduce AI-specific legislation in the UK, reflecting ongoing concerns about AI governance and regulatory gaps. Its reintroduction highlights the tension between the government’s pro-innovation stance and calls for formal oversight mechanisms amidst evolving global regulatory landscapes.
A California lawmaker has introduced the “No Robo Bosses Act,” aimed at regulating the use of artificial intelligence in the workplace. This legislation seeks to address concerns about AI replacing human jobs and ensuring fair treatment of workers.
Eight public bodies have been designated as competent authorities to implement and enforce the new EU AI Act in Ireland. This initiative aims to boost economic productivity and enhance public services while ensuring trust in AI systems.
This post discusses the complexities of intellectual property (IP) in the context of AI solutions, emphasizing the need for a tailored due diligence approach. It highlights critical questions regarding ownership, licensing rights, and the assessment of training data to mitigate risks associated with IP infringement.
The document discusses the regulatory considerations for clinical trials that utilize AI, emphasizing the importance of transparency and compliance with data standards. It outlines the necessity for a regulatory impact assessment and the thoughtful use of AI tools to ensure the integrity of clinical data and patient safety.
On February 20, 2025, the Virginia General Assembly passed HB 2094, the Virginia High-Risk Artificial Intelligence Developer and Deployer Act, which awaits the signature of Governor Youngkin. If enacted, Virginia will become the second state to legislate against algorithmic discrimination, targeting high-risk AI systems that significantly impact consequential decision-making.
The EU AI Act establishes a regulatory framework for AI that requires businesses operating in Europe to meet new standards for transparency, data quality, and bias reduction. While compliance may seem challenging, it presents opportunities for enhanced AI literacy within finance teams, enabling better understanding and utilization of AI to support informed decision-making.
The discussion raises questions about the necessity and effectiveness of the EU AI Act, suggesting that many of its provisions may be redundant or misdirected. Key points from a recent workshop highlight the challenges of defining AI and the potential for innovation to be stifled by overly stringent regulations.
