Hungary’s plan to use facial recognition systems against participants in pride events may violate the EU’s AI Act, which prohibits such technologies for real-time identification. Critics, including MEP Daniel Freund, argue that this move undermines democratic values and risks the rights to personal data protection for those involved.
California Senator Jerry McNerney introduced the “No Robo Bosses Act” to ensure human oversight of artificial intelligence in workplace decisions. The bill aims to implement safeguards against unjust impacts on workers’ livelihoods and working conditions caused by AI systems.
The GPAI Code of Practice outlines the requirements for compliance with EU copyright law for providers of General-Purpose AI models. The third draft emphasizes proportional compliance based on the provider’s size and capacities, with significant changes to copyright policy measures compared to the previous draft.
Spain’s government has approved a draft bill to regulate the ethical use of artificial intelligence, which includes mandatory labeling of AI-generated content. The bill aims to align national laws with EU regulations and prohibits harmful AI practices such as deepfakes and biometric recognition in public spaces.
With the introduction of the EU AI Act, financial organizations integrating artificial intelligence will face new compliance requirements that could result in significant penalties for non-compliance. The Act emphasizes the need for human oversight in automated decisions, pushing financial institutions to adapt their processes to ensure fairness and transparency in AI usage.
The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is working to enhance the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in the banking sector by addressing regulatory hurdles that may be stifling innovation. In May, the FCA plans to host a roundtable discussion with industry professionals to explore ways to balance technological advancement with compliance.
The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) poses significant questions regarding its potential use in violating EU competition law, particularly in relation to anticompetitive agreements. This blog post examines how AI may facilitate both horizontal and vertical agreements that could undermine competition in the market.
The EU’s AI Act aims to establish a uniform legal framework for AI systems, promoting human-centric and trustworthy AI while ensuring protection of health, safety, and fundamental rights. As of February 2, 2025, the Act imposes obligations such as ensuring AI literacy and prohibits practices deemed unacceptable, with significant penalties for non-compliance.
California State Senator Jerry McNerney has introduced the “No Robo Bosses Act,” which aims to require human oversight of artificial intelligence in workplace decision-making processes. The legislation, if passed, would be the first of its kind in the U.S., prohibiting companies from relying solely on automated systems for employment decisions without human intervention.
The AI Act is a significant legal framework established by the EU to regulate the use of artificial intelligence, aiming to ensure safety, transparency, and non-discrimination while promoting innovation. It has important implications for U.S. startups, especially those developing or deploying AI technologies in Europe, as they may face new compliance costs and legal obligations.
