A bipartisan group of California lawmakers is urging Congress to remove a provision from a federal tax bill that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence for the next decade. They argue that this provision threatens public safety and undermines state sovereignty, especially given California’s significant role in the AI industry.
California has finalized groundbreaking regulations addressing the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and automated decision systems (ADS) in employment, ensuring compliance with anti-discrimination laws. These regulations prohibit discriminatory impacts from ADS and impose recordkeeping and notice obligations on employers.
The EU AI Act does not apply retroactively to AI systems deployed before August 2, 2025, meaning they are largely exempt from new obligations, with some exceptions for prohibited practices. However, substantial modifications to these systems after this date will require full compliance with the Act.
As AI transforms healthcare, organizations are presented with both opportunities and risks, necessitating robust governance, risk management, and compliance (GRC) frameworks. Without these measures, advancements in AI can lead to ethical dilemmas, regulatory violations, and potential patient harm.
The proliferation of AI laws across various U.S. states is creating a complex regulatory environment that businesses must navigate to ensure compliance. With nearly 700 AI-related bills introduced in 2024, companies face significant challenges in adapting to the diverse requirements and potential legal risks associated with AI deployment.
The House has approved a GOP-backed reconciliation spending bill that includes a 10-year moratorium on state-level AI regulations, igniting a debate between Democrats and Republicans over the appropriate level of oversight for artificial intelligence technologies. Lawmakers are divided on whether strict regulations stifle innovation or are necessary to protect citizens and maintain U.S. leadership in AI.
As AI development advances, its use in cybersecurity is becoming inevitable, helping to detect and prevent cyber threats. However, bad actors can also leverage AI to develop more sophisticated attack methods, raising concerns about whether the EU AI Act will effectively enhance security or become an obstacle for businesses.
The European Union’s AI Act introduces comprehensive regulations for the development and deployment of artificial intelligence, categorizing AI systems based on their risk levels. It emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability, especially for high-risk AI applications, to ensure user awareness and compliance within various industries.
House Republicans are pushing a provision that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence for ten years, raising concerns among over 100 organizations. They argue that this could lead to unaccountability for companies designing harmful AI systems, potentially impacting various aspects of life.
The U.S. House Energy & Commerce Subcommittee held a hearing on May 21, 2025, to discuss AI regulation and its implications for U.S. leadership in technology. Witnesses emphasized the need for a cohesive national framework to avoid a confusing patchwork of state laws that could hinder innovation and consumer protection.