Despite congressional activity on AI in Colombia, regulation remains unclear and uncertain. More than 20 bills intended to regulate AI have been proposed, but none have been approved as of now.
European and American companies have urged the EU to delay the implementation of the AI Act for at least two years, citing concerns that the legislation could stifle AI development. A letter signed by 45 organizations, including major firms like ASML and Airbus, requests a more innovation-friendly approach to regulation.
In a significant move, BRICS nations have urged the United Nations to take the lead in establishing global regulations for artificial intelligence (AI). This initiative highlights the growing consensus on the need for structured governance to ensure that AI technologies benefit all countries equitably and responsibly.
An AI official from China emphasized the need for a collaborative and multi-governance ecosystem to promote AI as a public good and bridge the development gap. This call for cooperation highlights the importance of policy alignment and technology adaptation among BRICS countries and global partners.
Microsoft is expected to sign the European Union’s code of practice for artificial intelligence, while Meta Platforms has declined to do so, citing legal uncertainties. The code aims to ensure compliance with the EU’s AI regulations and requires companies to disclose training data.
Microsoft is expected to sign the European Union’s code of practice for artificial intelligence, while Meta Platforms has declined to do so, citing legal uncertainties. The code aims to ensure compliance with the EU’s AI regulations and requires companies to disclose training data.
The article discusses the complexities of regulating artificial intelligence (AI) as various countries adopt different approaches to governance, resulting in a fragmented landscape. It explores how these regulatory strategies can influence global standards and the behavior of technology companies within this evolving environment.
The article discusses the complexities of regulating artificial intelligence (AI) as various countries adopt different approaches to governance, resulting in a fragmented landscape. It explores how these regulatory strategies can influence global standards and the behavior of technology companies within this evolving environment.
The California Council on Science & Technology is hosting the first public dialogue on the findings of the new AI Frontiers Report, which focuses on AI governance and its implications for national and international standards. This event will feature speakers from prominent institutions and aims to address questions about California’s future in AI development.
The article discusses the importance of AI governance as a critical component in national AI strategies, emphasizing that social systems are more influential than technical capabilities in determining AI’s real-world impact. It argues that without effective governance to facilitate data access and integration, significant investments in AI infrastructure may not yield substantial public benefits.