The European Union (EU) is at a pivotal moment in its approach to artificial intelligence (AI), balancing the need for robust regulation with the drive for innovation to remain competitive against the United States and China. As it pivots toward a more innovation-focused strategy, concerns arise over potential risks to democratic safeguards and the EU’s credibility as a leader in ethical AI governance.
Society is undergoing a transformation driven by artificial intelligence (AI), which raises essential questions about how to maximize its benefits while minimizing risks. Key elements for AI success include robust infrastructure, an inclusive ecosystem, and effective governance to ensure that AI serves the broader interests of society.
China’s advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) are increasingly driven by open-source collaboration among tech giants like Alibaba, Baidu, and Tencent, positioning the country to influence global AI governance. This approach contrasts with the more closed models prevalent in the U.S., reflecting China’s strategy to leverage state support and foster a domestic AI ecosystem.
The essay discusses the intensifying competition between the United States and China in the field of artificial intelligence, highlighting how U.S. efforts to control AI development have led to a zero-sum mindset that could escalate geopolitical tensions. It warns that this approach may impede progress towards creating a global framework for AI safety and security.
The governments of Indonesia and Slovakia are exploring an alliance to develop inclusive global governance for artificial intelligence (AI), discussed during a recent meeting in Jakarta. This collaboration aims to address disparities in AI development and enhance mutual learning in AI regulation ahead of the upcoming Global Partnership on AI Summit in Slovakia.
The Pact for the Future adopted by the UN General Assembly includes the Global Digital Compact, which aims for an inclusive digital future but lacks concrete guidance for meaningful inclusivity. To avoid embedding inequity in AI governance, it is crucial to ensure diverse perspectives are represented in decision-making processes.
House Republicans have proposed a 10-year moratorium on state AI laws in response to concerns from tech companies about the growing complexity of state regulations on AI and data privacy. This proposal is part of a larger federal effort to create a unified framework for data privacy while addressing the needs of big tech vendors.
The European Union (EU) is at a critical juncture in its approach to artificial intelligence (AI), balancing the need for robust regulation with the imperative for innovation amid fierce global competition from the U.S. and China. As the EU pivots toward a more innovation-focused stance, it risks diluting its established ethical standards and democratic safeguards, which have historically set it apart in the realm of AI governance.
Abu Dhabi will host the inaugural Governance of Emerging Technologies Summit (GETS 2025) on May 5-6, bringing together over 500 leaders from various sectors to discuss the future of technology governance. The summit aims to establish governance frameworks that balance innovation with societal rights amidst rapid advancements in AI, quantum computing, and Web3 technologies.
The European Union’s AI Act, designed to promote algorithmic transparency and compliance among AI developers, is currently inspiring few global counterparts, with only Canada and Brazil drafting similar frameworks. Many countries, including the UK and Japan, are opting for less restrictive, more innovative approaches to AI regulation, raising concerns about the Act’s global influence.