The European Commission’s guidelines clarify the definition of an “AI system” under the AI Act, emphasizing its elements such as autonomy, adaptiveness, and inferencing capabilities. These guidelines aim to provide legal clarity for developers and regulators, ensuring a better understanding of what qualifies as an AI system within the EU framework.
The European Union has become the first in the world to introduce comprehensive regulations on artificial intelligence through the AI Act, aimed at ensuring safe, transparent, and ethical use of AI systems. This legislation addresses both the potential benefits and risks associated with AI technologies while promoting innovation and protecting citizens’ rights.
The article discusses the current challenges facing Europe’s AI governance, highlighting the need to prioritize fundamental rights amidst growing industrial competitiveness and regulatory rollbacks. Experts at the CPDP conference argue that traditional regulatory approaches may be inadequate, as they fail to address the deeper structural transformations brought about by technological advancements.
Experts in the life sciences industry are expressing concerns about the challenges posed by the EU AI Act as the sector adapts to new regulations. While the Act aims to protect citizens, it may complicate the integration of AI technologies into drug development processes.
The European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) is establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework for AI that will significantly impact both European and global markets. It introduces a phased implementation approach, with key obligations focusing on AI literacy and the prohibition of high-risk AI practices.
In February 2025, the European Commission published guidelines clarifying key aspects of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, particularly focusing on prohibited AI practices. These guidelines provide detailed interpretations of eight prohibited practices, offering guidance on compliance and the relationship between high-risk AI systems and these prohibitions.
The European Union’s AI Act serves as both a model and a cautionary tale for U.S. lawmakers, highlighting the balance between necessary consumer protections and the risks of overregulation. Experts warn that excessive regulations could hinder the U.S.’s competitive edge in the global AI landscape.
The European Union’s AI Act introduces comprehensive regulations for the development and deployment of artificial intelligence, categorizing AI systems based on their risk levels. It emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability, especially for high-risk AI applications, to ensure user awareness and compliance within various industries.
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) complicates the necessary use of data and AI, hindering companies from leveraging AI’s potential effectively. To enhance European competitiveness, there is a need for a more reasonable regulatory framework that simplifies data usage and removes unnecessary restrictions on automated decision-making.
The final version of the EU’s General Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice has been delayed, with publication now expected by August. This delay raises concerns about the timeline for the EU AI Act’s provisions, which are set to come into force on 2 August.