On August 2, 2025, the second stage of the EU AI Act came into force, regulating general purpose AI models and introducing obligations for transparency and accountability. This legislation marks a significant step in establishing a global framework for the governance of AI technology, aimed at ensuring safety and ethical use.
As the EU AI Act is implemented, companies involved with high-risk AI systems must comply with new obligations aimed at protecting fundamental rights and safety. Key requirements include risk management, data governance, and transparency measures for users, with compliance deadlines set for August 2026 and 2027.
The European Commission’s final draft of the General-Purpose Artificial Intelligence (GPAI) Code of Practice has sparked discussions about its implications for AI regulation, revealing an epistemic gap in how “general-purpose AI” is defined. The EU AI Act’s rigid legal constructs may hinder adaptive governance in a rapidly evolving technological landscape, emphasizing the need for anticipatory frameworks that embrace uncertainty and flexibility.
The European Union’s implementation of the Artificial Intelligence Act introduces new guidelines that aim to balance AI growth with copyright compliance, but this creates significant challenges for data access. The complexities of copyright law may hinder the competitiveness of EU AI models in a global market increasingly dominated by less restrictive regimes.
The EU AI Act pioneers global super AI regulation through its risk-based framework, categorizing AI systems by their potential harm and implementing tailored controls to protect society. By focusing on transparency and stringent oversight, the Act aims to mitigate existential threats posed by advanced AI technologies.
Michael McNamara discusses the complexities surrounding the regulation of AI in Europe, particularly in light of US pressure and the challenges of balancing innovation with the protection of creative sectors. He emphasizes the urgency for Europe to act decisively to safeguard cultural sovereignty and democratic values in the evolving AI landscape.
The European Commission is establishing a scientific panel of independent experts to assist in implementing the AI Act, focusing on general-purpose AI models and systems. The panel will advise on systemic risks and model classification, with applications closing on September 14.
The recent announcement from the EU Commission confirming that there will be no delay to the EU AI Act has sparked significant reactions, with many claiming both failure and victory. Companies are urged to take action now to ensure compliance, particularly with upcoming deadlines for General Purpose AI Models and AI Systems providers.
Siemens and SAP CEOs have called on the European Union to revise its artificial intelligence regulations, arguing that the current rules hinder innovation. They emphasize the need for a new regulatory framework that supports technological advancement rather than stifling it.
The EU’s newly published Code of Conduct on AI use has faced significant backlash from various stakeholders, with criticism highlighting concerns over regulatory complexity and potential impacts on competitiveness. Key figures, including CEOs and NGOs, are calling for a reassessment of the guidelines to better support innovation while ensuring safety and accountability.