The European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act introduces a comprehensive legal framework for AI, mandating new obligations for general-purpose AI systems. As of August 2, 2025, organizations must comply with specific requirements related to the deployment and development of these AI models, which include transparency and risk assessment measures.
The EU AI Act requires that any entity placing an AI model on the EU market determines if it qualifies as a general-purpose AI model (GPAI). This classification is essential for understanding the applicable provisions under the Act, which define a GPAI model as one capable of performing a wide range of tasks and integrating into various systems.
The AI Act reshapes the roles of corporate governance by making AI oversight a crucial responsibility for board secretaries, compliance officers, and general counsel. This legislation not only imposes new fiduciary duties but also highlights the need for U.S. corporations to align their governance structures with evolving regulatory frameworks that extend beyond Europe.
Apple’s Live Translation feature for AirPods, designed to enhance real-time communication through AI, will not be available to EU users due to strict regulations. This decision highlights ongoing challenges between tech companies and European regulators regarding data privacy and AI compliance.
The EU AI Act is now in effect, presenting multifaceted risks for legal leaders, including potential fines and reputational damage. To mitigate these risks, it’s crucial for General Counsel and Chief Legal Officers to ask their legal tech vendors seven key questions regarding compliance and governance.
Compliance with the EU AI Act is becoming a priority for UK businesses as they navigate its complex requirements to maintain market access. This blog post explores key obligations under the Act and best practices for implementing ethical AI solutions that align with both EU and UK regulatory frameworks.
European schools are navigating the EU AI Act to ensure that artificial intelligence systems used in classrooms are safe, fair, and transparent. The Act classifies AI by risk and mandates compliance to avoid significant penalties, prompting educational leaders to adopt innovative strategies that prioritize student learning while adhering to new regulations.
Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU’s AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a phased approach with proposed guardrails for high-risk AI. Understanding these regulations is essential for compliance and can provide a competitive edge in the tech industry.
Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The draft AI Market Surveillance and Innovation Promotion Act aims to enhance existing regulatory frameworks and provide businesses with clear guidance on AI governance.
On August 2, 2025, the second stage of the EU AI Act came into force, regulating general purpose AI models and introducing obligations for transparency and accountability. This legislation marks a significant step in establishing a global framework for the governance of AI technology, aimed at ensuring safety and ethical use.