The European Union’s AI Act serves as both a model and a cautionary tale for U.S. lawmakers, highlighting the balance between necessary consumer protections and the risks of overregulation. Experts warn that excessive regulations could hinder the U.S.’s competitive edge in the global AI landscape.
The European Union’s AI Act introduces comprehensive regulations for the development and deployment of artificial intelligence, categorizing AI systems based on their risk levels. It emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability, especially for high-risk AI applications, to ensure user awareness and compliance within various industries.
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) complicates the necessary use of data and AI, hindering companies from leveraging AI’s potential effectively. To enhance European competitiveness, there is a need for a more reasonable regulatory framework that simplifies data usage and removes unnecessary restrictions on automated decision-making.
The final version of the EU’s General Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice has been delayed, with publication now expected by August. This delay raises concerns about the timeline for the EU AI Act’s provisions, which are set to come into force on 2 August.
On April 9, 2025, the European Commission published the AI Continent Action Plan, outlining the EU’s strategy to enhance innovation and regulatory compliance in artificial intelligence. The plan emphasizes the importance of trustworthy AI and includes various initiatives to support the development and adoption of AI across key sectors.
The article discusses the progress of the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) and the implementation of the Artificial Intelligence Act, highlighting significant decisions and ongoing enforcement actions. It emphasizes the challenges faced during the stakeholder consultation process for the upcoming General-Purpose AI Code of Practice.
The European Union’s AI Act, designed to promote algorithmic transparency and compliance among AI developers, is currently inspiring few global counterparts, with only Canada and Brazil drafting similar frameworks. Many countries, including the UK and Japan, are opting for less restrictive, more innovative approaches to AI regulation, raising concerns about the Act’s global influence.
EU policymakers are considering setting threshold measures of computational resources to help businesses determine the regulatory requirements for AI models they train or modify under the EU AI Act. The proposals aim to clarify the scope of rules applicable to general-purpose AI models, with feedback from stakeholders expected to shape new guidelines effective from August 2025.
Europe is moving forward with its AI Act, which will require high-risk medical devices with AI components to comply with both the new regulations and existing device rules. As implementation approaches, medical device manufacturers express concerns about the potential burdens these regulations may impose.
The EU AI Act establishes prohibited practices for AI that pose significant risks to fundamental rights, including issues like indiscriminate biometric surveillance and social scoring. Salesforce emphasizes the importance of aligning AI development with ethical considerations and offers recommendations for companies to ensure responsible AI deployment.
Take the first steps in your transformation towards international AI compliance.
Our expert sales team is here to answer your questions, just leave your email and we’ll get in touch.
