The recent announcement from the EU Commission confirming that there will be no delay to the EU AI Act has sparked significant reactions, with many claiming both failure and victory. Companies are urged to take action now to ensure compliance, particularly with upcoming deadlines for General Purpose AI Models and AI Systems providers.
Siemens and SAP CEOs have called on the European Union to revise its artificial intelligence regulations, arguing that the current rules hinder innovation. They emphasize the need for a new regulatory framework that supports technological advancement rather than stifling it.
The EU’s newly published Code of Conduct on AI use has faced significant backlash from various stakeholders, with criticism highlighting concerns over regulatory complexity and potential impacts on competitiveness. Key figures, including CEOs and NGOs, are calling for a reassessment of the guidelines to better support innovation while ensuring safety and accountability.
Meta has announced that it will not be signing the EU AI Act code of practice due to concerns about legal uncertainties and overreach that could hinder AI development in Europe. The company’s chief global affairs officer emphasized that such measures could stifle innovation for European businesses relying on advanced AI models.
The European Commission has published guidance for general-purpose AI models under the AI Act, clarifying the obligations for providers and defining what constitutes a general-purpose AI model. The guidance outlines compliance expectations, particularly for advanced models posing systemic risks, with a timeline for implementation starting from August 2025.
The European Commission has issued guidelines to assist AI models identified as having systemic risks in complying with the EU’s artificial intelligence regulation, known as the AI Act. Companies face significant penalties for violations, with the guidelines requiring evaluations, risk assessments, and cybersecurity measures for compliance.
The European Commission is inviting experts to apply for its newly established AI Act Advisory Forum, which will provide crucial guidance on the implementation of the EU’s AI Act aimed at ensuring responsible AI usage. This forum seeks a diverse range of professionals to ensure balanced representation and address the multifaceted challenges of AI regulation.
The European Commission is inviting experts to apply for its newly established AI Act Advisory Forum, which will provide crucial guidance on the implementation of the EU’s AI Act aimed at ensuring responsible AI usage. This forum seeks a diverse range of professionals to ensure balanced representation and address the multifaceted challenges of AI regulation.
Thirty-one artists from Europe have launched a campaign urging the EU Commission to “Stay True to the AI Act,” criticizing its implementation for failing to adequately protect artists’ rights against AI companies. They argue that the legislation is being weakened, which undermines the protections originally intended for creators.
As artificial intelligence becomes integral to modern infrastructure, the EU AI Act establishes crucial standards for safety and accountability in its deployment, particularly in traffic management. FLIR’s proprietary AI model for Intelligent Traffic Systems not only complies with this legislation but is designed to prioritize transparency and user privacy.