Experts discuss the implications of the recently passed H.R. 1, which would pause state and local regulations on artificial intelligence for ten years. The article examines the benefits and drawbacks of AI regulation, highlighting the need for careful oversight to balance innovation with potential social impacts.
The Data (Use and Access) Act (the “DUA Act”) was enacted in the UK on 19 June 2025, reforming the General Data Protection Regulation and addressing copyright issues related to generative AI. The Act’s passage followed extensive parliamentary debate, particularly concerning the use of copyright works for training AI models without consent.
The European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act, often referred to as the ‘new GDPR’, has come into effect, marking a significant shift towards the regulation of AI technologies. This comprehensive legislation aims to ensure that AI systems are safe, respect fundamental rights, and promote trustworthy innovation within the EU market.
This research project investigates how the EU Artificial Intelligence Act is transforming corporate governance and accountability frameworks, compelling companies to reconfigure responsibilities and anticipate liability throughout their structure. It highlights the need for a model of distributed accountability that reflects the increasing integration of operational decision-making with legal compliance.
This research project investigates how the EU Artificial Intelligence Act is transforming corporate governance and accountability frameworks, compelling companies to reconfigure responsibilities and anticipate liability throughout their structure. It highlights the need for a model of distributed accountability that reflects the increasing integration of operational decision-making with legal compliance.
This research project investigates how the EU Artificial Intelligence Act is transforming corporate governance and accountability frameworks, compelling companies to reconfigure responsibilities and anticipate liability throughout their structure. It highlights the need for a model of distributed accountability that reflects the increasing integration of operational decision-making with legal compliance.
New York lawmakers have passed the RAISE Act, a comprehensive bill aimed at regulating AI safety, which now awaits the governor’s approval. The legislation requires large language model developers to disclose safety protocols and risk evaluations, with significant penalties for noncompliance.
The New York State Senate has passed the RAISE Act, a significant AI safety bill aimed at imposing critical safeguards on the development and deployment of artificial intelligence technologies. Spearheaded by Senator Andrew Gounardes, the legislation seeks to ensure that developers implement safety protocols to protect society as AI continues to permeate various sectors.
The European Commission’s guidelines clarify the definition of an “AI system” under the AI Act, emphasizing its elements such as autonomy, adaptiveness, and inferencing capabilities. These guidelines aim to provide legal clarity for developers and regulators, ensuring a better understanding of what qualifies as an AI system within the EU framework.
Dr. Rejoice Malisa-van der Walt emphasizes the importance of developing South Africa’s artificial intelligence (AI) policy by integrating elements from international frameworks while addressing the country’s unique needs. The goal is to create regulations that foster innovation and ensure AI serves all citizens, considering past challenges and current goals.