The European Commission announced that a code of practice to help companies comply with the EU’s artificial intelligence rules may only be implemented by the end of 2025. This delay follows calls from various stakeholders, including major tech firms, for additional time to prepare for the new regulations.
Artificial intelligence is at a critical juncture, with many enterprise AI initiatives failing to reach production and exposing organizations to significant risks. Effective AI governance is essential to prevent these issues, ensuring that AI systems are treated as vital assets requiring ongoing oversight and adaptation.
The commission is considering providing a grace period for companies that agree to comply with the new AI Code. This initiative aims to facilitate a smoother transition for businesses adapting to the upcoming regulations.
On June 22, 2025, Texas enacted the Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act, making it the second state to implement comprehensive AI legislation. The act establishes a framework for the development and oversight of AI systems, aiming to balance innovation with consumer protection and ethical considerations.
On June 22, 2025, Texas enacted the Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act, making it the second state to implement comprehensive AI legislation. The act establishes a framework for the development and oversight of AI systems, aiming to balance innovation with consumer protection and ethical considerations.
Denmark has introduced a law that grants individuals copyright over their likenesses to combat deepfakes, making it illegal to share such content without consent. Other European countries are also taking steps to regulate deepfakes through various laws that focus on transparency and the protection of individual rights.
The federal government aims to enhance productivity by implementing artificial intelligence (AI) across various sectors, but emphasizes the importance of thoughtful deployment to avoid wasting public funds. It warns that without adequate oversight and expertise, AI tools could lead to significant risks related to privacy, ethics, and environmental impact.
On July 1, 2025, the U.S. Senate voted to reject a proposed ten-year moratorium on state-level AI regulation, allowing individual states to legislate independently. This decision creates a fragmented compliance environment for insurance carriers that must navigate varying state laws regarding AI use.
On July 1, 2025, the U.S. Senate voted to reject a proposed ten-year moratorium on state-level AI regulation, allowing individual states to legislate independently. This decision creates a fragmented compliance environment for insurance carriers that must navigate varying state laws regarding AI use.
The Data (Use and Access) Act (the “DUA Act”) was enacted in the UK on 19 June 2025, reforming the General Data Protection Regulation and addressing copyright issues related to generative AI. The Act’s passage followed extensive parliamentary debate, particularly concerning the use of copyright works for training AI models without consent.
