The AI Liability Directive (AILD) was proposed by the European Commission in September 2022 to introduce uniform rules for non-contractual civil claims related to AI. However, the AILD has faced stagnation and resistance in the legislative process, with recent indications of a potential withdrawal from consideration.
On March 4, 2025, the Irish government approved a recommendation to implement a distributed regulatory model for enforcing the EU Artificial Intelligence Act. This marks a significant step in establishing a framework for AI governance in Ireland, designating eight public bodies as national competent authorities responsible for oversight in their respective sectors.
This blog post explores the potential overlaps and contradictions between the EU’s AI Act and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). It highlights the importance of understanding how both regulations interact, particularly regarding the processing of personal data by AI systems.
The UK is working on new regulations to better govern software and AI in medical devices, with the MHRA focusing on principles that ensure safety and efficacy. As innovation accelerates, the MHRA has initiated programs like the AI Airlock pilot to streamline the path for AI medical devices to reach the market.
This blog post explores the rise of experimental regulations and regulatory sandboxes within the context of the EU’s AI Act, emphasizing their potential to foster innovation while safeguarding fundamental rights. It analyzes whether these new legislative approaches can effectively address the challenges posed by rapidly evolving artificial intelligence technologies.
As state and local legislatures begin to craft their own AI regulations, automated decision making has become a key focus area. Laws in places like Colorado, Illinois, and New York City aim to prevent discrimination in AI systems used for significant consumer decisions.
The Artificial Intelligence (Regulation) Bill seeks to introduce AI-specific legislation in the UK, reflecting ongoing concerns about AI governance and regulatory gaps. Its reintroduction highlights the tension between the government’s pro-innovation stance and calls for formal oversight mechanisms amidst evolving global regulatory landscapes.
A California lawmaker has introduced the “No Robo Bosses Act,” aimed at regulating the use of artificial intelligence in the workplace. This legislation seeks to address concerns about AI replacing human jobs and ensuring fair treatment of workers.
The new EU Product Liability Directive 2024/2853, which came into force on December 8, 2024, significantly modernizes product liability rules and explicitly includes software and AI-integrated products. Companies using AI in their products must be aware that they can be held liable for damages caused by software defects, including issues arising from insufficient updates or cybersecurity weaknesses.
Eight public bodies have been designated as competent authorities to implement and enforce the new EU AI Act in Ireland. This initiative aims to boost economic productivity and enhance public services while ensuring trust in AI systems.