Category: AI Regulation

False Confidence in the EU AI Act: Understanding the Epistemic Gaps

The European Commission’s final draft of the General-Purpose Artificial Intelligence (GPAI) Code of Practice has sparked discussions about its implications for AI regulation, revealing an epistemic gap in how “general-purpose AI” is defined. The EU AI Act’s rigid legal constructs may hinder adaptive governance in a rapidly evolving technological landscape, emphasizing the need for anticipatory frameworks that embrace uncertainty and flexibility.

Read More »

Transforming AI Governance: The EU Act’s Framework Against Super AI Risks

The EU AI Act establishes a risk-based framework that categorizes AI systems based on their potential harm, imposing strict regulations on high-risk and prohibited uses to enhance human oversight and cybersecurity. This legislative approach aims to prevent existential threats from super AI while promoting responsible innovation and safeguarding human rights.

Read More »

EU AI Act: Key Changes and Future Implications

The EU AI Act reached a significant milestone on August 2, 2025, marking the beginning of real obligations for general-purpose AI models. Providers must now meet specific requirements to enter the EU market, including documentation, copyright policies, and risk evaluations, with enforcement set to begin in August 2026.

Read More »

AI Copyright Dilemma in the EU

The European Union’s implementation of the Artificial Intelligence Act introduces new guidelines that aim to balance AI growth with copyright compliance, but this creates significant challenges for data access. The complexities of copyright law may hinder the competitiveness of EU AI models in a global market increasingly dominated by less restrictive regimes.

Read More »

EU AI Act: Setting the Standard for Global Super AI Regulation

The EU AI Act pioneers global super AI regulation through its risk-based framework, categorizing AI systems by their potential harm and implementing tailored controls to protect society. By focusing on transparency and stringent oversight, the Act aims to mitigate existential threats posed by advanced AI technologies.

Read More »

Classifying Your AI System Under the EU AI Act Made Easy

The EU AI Act categorizes AI systems into four risk levels: Unacceptable, High-risk, Limited, and Minimal. Genbounty offers a free Risk Classification Wizard to help teams quickly determine their system’s category and understand the corresponding obligations for compliance.

Read More »

AI Legislation: Bridging Global Gaps at AIPPI 2025

The AIPPI 2025 congress in Yokohama will address crucial topics in AI law, such as artificial intelligence and copyright, compulsory licenses, and exhaustion of trademark rights. AIPPI president Lorenza Ferrari Hofer emphasizes the need for global harmonization in AI legislation to ensure safe and effective development across borders.

Read More »

Colorado’s AI Act: New Compliance Challenges for Businesses

Last week, Colorado lawmakers decided to delay the implementation of the Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (CAIA) until June 30, 2026, extending the timeline for businesses to prepare. The CAIA establishes liability for unintentional discrimination in AI systems, contrasting sharply with the federal approach that limits liability to intentional discrimination only.

Read More »

AI Surveillance: Ensuring Safety Without Sacrificing Privacy

AI-driven surveillance enhances safety through advanced technologies like facial recognition and behavior analysis, but it poses significant risks to privacy, civil liberties, and social equity. As regulatory frameworks evolve unevenly globally, striking a balance between safety and individual rights remains essential for democratic societies.

Read More »