California has passed SB 53, a bill requiring transparency reports from developers of powerful AI models to address catastrophic risks such as AI-enabled biological weapons attacks. The bill aims to hold AI companies accountable for safety commitments and prevent potential disasters before they occur.
California’s Assembly Bill 1018, which aims to require transparency and the right to appeal automated decisions affecting individuals, has been delayed for the third consecutive year. The decision allows for further discussions with Governor Gavin Newsom and addresses concerns raised by various industry opponents.
The EU AI Act, launching in August 2025, establishes a comprehensive legal framework for ethical AI development worldwide, categorizing AI by risk and imposing strict documentation and governance requirements, particularly for General-Purpose AI models. Non-compliance can lead to substantial fines, making it a pivotal regulation for AI developers globally.
AI will not eliminate legal jobs in Brazil by 2025, but it will automate routine tasks like research and drafting, potentially affecting 31.3 million workers. As demand rises for expertise in areas such as LGPD compliance and liability, targeted reskilling will be crucial for legal professionals.
The debate over whether Congress should preempt state-level AI laws has intensified, with proponents arguing that conflicting regulations could hinder innovation. Historical lessons suggest that Congress typically intervenes to ensure uniformity and leverage federal expertise when managing emerging technologies.
The EU AI Act is now in effect, presenting multifaceted risks for legal leaders, including potential fines and reputational damage. To mitigate these risks, it’s crucial for General Counsel and Chief Legal Officers to ask their legal tech vendors seven key questions regarding compliance and governance.
The emergence of agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems capable of autonomous decision-making poses significant regulatory challenges, as these systems can operate independently without constant human oversight. Organizations must navigate the evolving legal landscape to mitigate operational, financial, and reputational risks associated with the deployment of such advanced AI technologies.
Lawmakers are grappling with the challenge of regulating artificial intelligence amidst rapid technological advancements. The discourse emphasizes the need for thoughtful legislation that balances innovation with safety, as demonstrated in various real-world applications of AI.
In February 2025, the European Commission published guidelines to clarify key aspects of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, including the definition of an “AI system.” The guidelines detail the necessary characteristics of AI systems, such as autonomy, adaptiveness, and their ability to infer outputs from given inputs.
The Business Council of Australia urges the federal government and private sector to act swiftly to harness the potential of artificial intelligence, warning that inaction could lead Australia to fall behind global competitors. A report highlights the importance of AI for economic growth and advocates for a structured approach to implementing AI across various sectors by 2028.