The article discusses the regulatory gaps in AI laws affecting workplace privacy rights in Colorado and California. It highlights how different labels for individuals—such as “consumer” or “applicant”—result in varying rights and responsibilities, creating complexity for compliance teams.
The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) is significant, with 72% of S&P 500 companies disclosing AI-related risks in 2025, up from just 12% two years ago. Key concerns include reputational, cybersecurity, and compliance risks, particularly in sectors like financials, industrials, information technology, and health care.
On October 10, 2025, Italy enacted Law No. 132/2025, becoming the first EU Member State to implement a comprehensive national framework for artificial intelligence. This law aligns with the EU AI Act and introduces key innovations, including national authorities for AI supervision and measures for copyright protection for AI-generated works.
The Center for AI and Digital Policy has endorsed five candidates for the UN’s newly established global AI panel, aiming to strengthen evidence-based understanding of artificial intelligence. This panel, consisting of 40 experts, will serve for a three-year term beginning in 2026 and is part of the UN’s commitment to an inclusive digital future.
Chile is implementing one of the toughest AI laws globally, aiming to regulate artificial intelligence without deterring big tech investment. The proposed legislation categorizes AI systems by risk level and bans technologies that undermine human dignity, but it faces backlash from tech giants concerned about compliance burdens and potential impacts on innovation.
The European Commission is assembling a Scientific Panel of 60 independent experts to guide the implementation of the AI Act, focusing on general-purpose AI systems. The selection process faces challenges due to member states imposing national quotas, which may hinder the inclusion of leading AI researchers necessary for effective oversight.
The EU AI Act introduces a new transparency framework that challenges traditional trade secret protections by requiring AI developers to disclose detailed information about their systems. As companies navigate the tension between compliance and confidentiality, they must strategically manage transparency to protect their competitive edge.
On September 26, 2025, the European Commission published draft guidance on reporting serious incidents related to high-risk AI systems, as mandated by the EU AI Act. The guidance outlines the obligations for providers to notify authorities of serious incidents and includes a reporting template, with a public consultation open until November 7, 2025.
The EU AI Act Newsletter provides updates on the implementation of the EU artificial intelligence law, highlighting the launch of the AI Act Service Desk and Single Information Platform to assist stakeholders. Additionally, it discusses Italy’s new national AI law, the Netherlands’ approach to clarifying AI regulations, and critiques from industry leaders regarding EU overregulation.
In contemporary American society, the politicization of issues has become common, threatening to affect AI safety. To prevent this, the post suggests measures such as fostering a neutral relationship with the AI ethics community and creating a confidential incident database for AI labs.