U.S. President Donald Trump revoked a 2023 executive order by Joe Biden aimed at mitigating the risks of artificial intelligence to national security and public safety. The order required AI developers to share safety test results with the government before public release, a measure that the Republican Party criticized as hindering innovation.
The “Basic Act on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Development and Trust Building” recently passed in South Korea aims to balance regulation and promotion of AI technologies, positioning the country as a leader in AI legislation. It establishes a framework for responsible AI advancement while prioritizing job creation and transparency in high-impact AI applications.
The EU AI Act introduces critical compliance deadlines for HR leaders, particularly Chief Human Resources Officers (CHROs), as they navigate the regulatory landscape surrounding artificial intelligence. To avoid potential penalties, CHROs must catalog AI use cases, address prohibited applications, and ensure their workforce is equipped with AI literacy and oversight skills.
The EU AI Act, adopted in June 2024, is the world’s first comprehensive regulation aimed at governing artificial intelligence, significantly affecting how public authorities utilize AI in administrative contexts. By requiring member states to align their laws with the Act, it not only influences national procedures but also fosters the Europeanisation of administrative law through the application of EU principles of procedural justice.
The 2025 landscape for artificial intelligence legislation and regulation is evolving rapidly, particularly at the state level, where various laws are being enacted to prevent algorithmic discrimination in employment decisions. Employers must stay informed about these changes to ensure compliance and mitigate risks associated with the use of AI systems.
The EU AI Act requires non-EU providers of high-risk AI systems and general-purpose AI models to appoint an authorised representative within the EU to ensure compliance with regulations. This representative must perform several duties, including verifying technical documentation and cooperating with competent authorities on regulatory matters.
Texas House Bill 1709 establishes a comprehensive framework for regulating high-risk artificial intelligence systems, emphasizing transparency, fairness, and accountability in their application, particularly in employment contexts. Employers must prepare for new obligations, including conducting impact assessments and ensuring their AI systems do not contribute to algorithmic discrimination.
The article discusses the interplay between the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the newly introduced AI Act in the European Union, highlighting how both frameworks aim to protect individuals’ rights while governing AI systems. It emphasizes the importance of understanding their complementary nature and the potential conflicts that may arise in compliance efforts.
On January 20th, 2025, President Trump revoked Executive Order 14110, which was a comprehensive governance framework on artificial intelligence in the USA. The revocation raises concerns as it lacks a replacement, potentially stepping backwards in the regulation of AI technologies that are increasingly integrated into society.
The EU AI Act, adopted in June 2024, represents a significant regulatory effort to oversee artificial intelligence across member states, influencing how public authorities utilize AI systems in various administrative contexts. By establishing procedural obligations and triggering the application of EU fundamental rights principles, the AI Act may lead to the Europeanisation of national administrative law and reshape the interplay between EU and domestic public law in digital regulation.