The rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative AI, presents both opportunities and significant risks for businesses regarding compliance with legal and regulatory environments. Organizations must carefully assess their use of AI to identify vulnerabilities and ensure adherence to evolving regulatory frameworks.
EDRi affiliate Politiscope hosted an event in Croatia to discuss the human rights impacts of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and to influence national policy ahead of the implementation of the EU AI Act. The event highlighted the risks associated with AI, including privacy threats and algorithmic discrimination, while advocating for stronger safeguards for people’s rights.
As artificial intelligence systems evolve to make decisions and act independently, the legal frameworks that govern them are struggling to keep pace. This raises critical questions about whether AI should be granted legal personhood, as it blurs the lines of accountability and responsibility in areas such as contract and tort law.
The article emphasizes the critical role of data provenance in ensuring effective AI governance within organizations, highlighting the need for continuous oversight and accountability in AI interactions. It argues that traditional governance policies are insufficient and that a robust infrastructure focused on data lineage is essential for building trust in AI systems.
A lawmaker in the Philippines, Senator Grace Poe, emphasizes the need for a balanced approach in regulating artificial intelligence (AI) to ensure ethical and innovative use of the technology. She warns against over-regulating AI while recognizing its potential benefits and the importance of public consultation in developing guidelines.
The European Union’s AI Act serves as both a model and a cautionary tale for U.S. lawmakers, highlighting the balance between necessary consumer protections and the risks of overregulation. Experts warn that excessive regulations could hinder the U.S.’s competitive edge in the global AI landscape.
A bipartisan group of California lawmakers is urging Congress to remove a provision from a federal tax bill that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence for the next decade. They argue that this provision threatens public safety and undermines state sovereignty, especially given California’s significant role in the AI industry.
The United States is on the verge of enacting a federal measure that would impose a ten-year ban on state regulations concerning artificial intelligence (AI), a provision included in President Trump’s ‘One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) 2025.’ This decision has sparked significant opposition from various lawmakers and civil society groups, who express concerns over the potential risks to consumer protection and regulatory oversight.
Since 2016, over thirty countries have enacted laws addressing Artificial Intelligence, and discussions about AI regulation are intensifying globally in 2025. UNESCO’s consultation paper outlines nine regulatory approaches to AI, ranging from light-touch measures to more coercive regulations, highlighting the need for a balanced framework in AI governance.
The governments of Indonesia and Slovakia are exploring an alliance to develop inclusive global governance for artificial intelligence (AI), discussed during a recent meeting in Jakarta. This collaboration aims to address disparities in AI development and enhance mutual learning in AI regulation ahead of the upcoming Global Partnership on AI Summit in Slovakia.
Take the first steps in your transformation towards international AI compliance.
Our expert sales team is here to answer your questions, just leave your email and we’ll get in touch.
