Balancing AI Management: IT vs. HR Responsibilities

Who Manages AI Agents: IT or HR?

As AI-powered agents become increasingly integrated into business operations, organizations are faced with a pressing challenge: determining who should manage these AI-driven systems—IT or HR?

AI is no longer confined to back-end automation; it actively participates in customer service, recruitment, data analysis, and even strategic decision-making. With AI increasingly influencing both operational efficiency and workplace culture, companies must decide which department is better suited to oversee its performance, ethical considerations, and continuous optimization.

THE CASE FOR IT: THE ARCHITECTS OF AI

Historically, IT has been the backbone of technological implementation and maintenance, ensuring that systems remain secure, efficient, and compliant. Given that AI agents are fundamentally software-driven entities, IT naturally assumes responsibility for their infrastructure, security, and regulatory adherence.

IT teams play a critical role in:

  • Maintaining AI Reliability And Accuracy: AI models should be monitored and fine-tuned to prevent performance degradation over time. IT ensures seamless integration with existing business systems and databases.
  • Managing Security Risks: AI interacts with vast amounts of sensitive data, from customer records to financial analytics. IT safeguards against cybersecurity threats, unauthorized access, and AI-generated misinformation.
  • Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: AI governance must align with evolving laws like GDPR, the EU AI Act, and corporate AI ethics policies. IT tracks and enforces compliance protocols to mitigate legal risks.

However, while IT ensures AI functions properly, it doesn’t always address the human impact of AI in the workplace. This is where HR comes in.

THE CASE FOR HR: THE ARCHITECTS OF PEOPLE AND CULTURE

HR has traditionally been responsible for managing employees, but what happens when AI agents begin acting as digital coworkers and influencing hiring decisions, workload distribution, and even employee evaluations? As AI increasingly interacts with the workforce, HR should step in to oversee its role in shaping workplace dynamics.

HR’s responsibilities in AI governance include:

  • Preventing AI Bias In Hiring And Performance Evaluation: AI-powered hiring tools have been found to exhibit gender and racial biases if not carefully managed. HR must ensure fairness and ethical AI-driven decision-making.
  • Facilitating Human-AI Collaboration: Employees need to adapt to working alongside AI tools. HR can lead training programs to ensure AI enhances, rather than replaces, human skills.
  • Assessing AI’s Impact On Company Culture: If AI is dictating employee productivity metrics or handling customer interactions, then HR should ensure that it aligns with company values and enhances, rather than diminishes, workplace morale.

A SHARED RESPONSIBILITY: THE AI OVERSIGHT CONVERGENCE

The reality is that AI management is not an either-or question. Rather, it’s a shared responsibility between IT and HR. Just as HR collaborates with IT when rolling out employee management software, AI oversight requires a cross-functional approach.

Forward-thinking organizations are forming AI governance committees, which bring together IT, HR, legal, and operations leaders to set ethical AI policies and guidelines, regularly audit AI decisions for bias and unintended consequences, and define best practices for human-AI collaboration.

For instance, Microsoft has established an AI Ethics and Effects in Engineering and Research (AETHER) Committee, which includes experts across multiple disciplines to ensure AI aligns with ethical principles while meeting technical performance standards.

WHAT’S NEXT? THE RISE OF AI MANAGEMENT ROLES

As AI agents become a permanent part of the workforce, new leadership roles are likely to emerge to bridge the gap between IT’s technical oversight and HR’s focus on workplace impact.

Companies may introduce positions such as:

  • Chief AI Ethics Officer: Responsible for ensuring AI-driven decisions align with ethical standards and corporate values.
  • AI Workforce Manager: Oversees how AI interacts with human employees to ensure fairness and productivity.
  • AI Governance Director: Develops policies that balance AI’s benefits with potential risks.

By proactively defining AI management responsibilities today, businesses can shape AI as a force for innovation, efficiency, and ethical business practices.

THE BIGGER QUESTION: STRUCTURING AI OVERSIGHT FOR THE FUTURE

The question isn’t just “Should IT or HR manage AI agents?” but “How should companies structure AI oversight to maximize its benefits while mitigating risks?” The businesses that establish clear AI governance strategies now are most likely to be the ones leading the future of work.

More Insights

Congress’s Silent Strike Against AI Regulation

A provision in Congress's budget bill could preempt all state regulation of AI for the next ten years, effectively removing public recourse against AI-related harm. This measure threatens the progress...

Congress Moves to Limit California’s AI Protections

House Republicans are advancing legislation that would impose a 10-year ban on state regulations regarding artificial intelligence, alarming California leaders who fear it would undermine existing...

AI Missteps and National Identity: Lessons from Malaysia’s Flag Controversies

Recent incidents involving AI-generated misrepresentations of Malaysia’s national flag highlight the urgent need for better digital governance and AI literacy. The failures in recognizing national...

Responsible AI: Insights from the Global Trust Maturity Survey

The rapid growth of generative AI and large language models is driving adoption across various business functions, necessitating the deployment of AI in a safe and responsible manner. A recent...

Driving Responsible AI: The Business Case for Ethical Innovation

Philosophical principles and regulatory frameworks have often dominated discussions on AI ethics, failing to resonate with key decision-makers. This article identifies three primary drivers—top-down...

Streamlining AI Regulations for Competitive Advantage in Europe

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) complicates the necessary use of data and AI, hindering companies from leveraging AI's potential effectively. To enhance European competitiveness, there...

Colorado’s AI Act: Legislative Setback and Compliance Challenges Ahead

The Colorado Legislature recently failed to amend the Artificial Intelligence Act, originally passed in 2024, which imposes strict regulations on high-risk AI systems. Proposed amendments aimed to...

AI in Recruitment: Balancing Innovation and Compliance

AI is revolutionizing recruitment by streamlining processes such as resume screening and candidate engagement, but it also raises concerns about bias and compliance with regulations. While the EU has...

EU Member States Struggle to Fund AI Act Enforcement

EU policy adviser Kai Zenner has warned that many EU member states are facing financial difficulties and a shortage of expertise necessary to enforce the AI Act effectively. As the phased...