South Korea’s new AI Basic Act, effective January 2026, aims to regulate high-impact AI systems while promoting technology development and safety for users. It introduces a unique framework that encourages voluntary measures for AI safety, contrasting with the more stringent regulations found in the EU AI Act.
This paper discusses the importance of risk management in AI governance, highlighting the need for frameworks that focus on preventing harms rather than merely reducing hazards. It advocates for a sociotechnical approach to risk assessment, emphasizing the integration of various expertise and interventions to effectively mitigate AI-related risks.
Biopharma Institute, in collaboration with RiskCortex, has launched the AI Regulatory Compliance: Expert-in-the-Loop Certification Program, designed to empower professionals in the life sciences sector to effectively oversee AI use while ensuring compliance and regulatory integrity. This industry-first certification addresses the urgent need for skilled oversight as organizations increasingly adopt AI technologies in highly regulated environments.
Western Visayas has launched an action plan and ethics policy for artificial intelligence (AI) aimed at promoting inclusive adoption and exploring sector-specific applications in education, health, and energy. The initiative reflects a commitment to responsible AI use and regional development, as emphasized by local leaders during the recent turnover ceremony in Boracay Island.
A new proposal from Colorado’s Governor aims to replace the existing AI Act, shifting the focus from regulating high-risk AI systems to enhancing consumer rights and transparency. This framework would reduce compliance burdens for AI developers and deployers while raising questions about the enforcement of existing discrimination and consumer protection laws.
During a seminar, Mayukh Sircar discussed the strategic role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in businesses, highlighting essential governance processes and risk management. He emphasized the importance of thorough vendor evaluations and the need for transparency in AI agreements to mitigate potential liabilities.
The escalating conflict between Anthropic and the Pentagon raises significant concerns about AI safety and First Amendment rights, as it questions whether the government can penalize companies for ethical noncompliance. This case not only impacts investor confidence in the AI industry but also challenges the legal status of AI as a form of protected speech.
On March 17, 2026, the Colorado AI Policy Work Group proposed a new legal framework to replace the Colorado AI Act, focusing on transparency, recordkeeping, and consumer rights. If enacted, the Proposed ADMT Framework will take effect on January 1, 2027, requiring developers and deployers to adapt their compliance programs by the end of 2026.
Japan’s recent enactment of the AI Promotion Act establishes a layered governance framework designed to support AI development while ensuring compliance with existing laws. This approach balances flexibility and investment attraction with the ability to impose regulations as necessary, addressing key concerns like data protection and competition enforcement.
Sorena AI is enhancing its position in the governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) market with a proof-first AI-powered compliance platform that emphasizes execution over mere task tracking. The platform aims to provide compliance teams with verified, source-linked outputs and audit-ready reports, addressing the inefficiencies of traditional GRC systems.