This morning, the White House released a four-page “National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence,” outlining the roles of state and federal governments in AI regulation. The framework emphasizes federal preemption of state AI laws while addressing important issues such as copyright and child safety.
This article discusses the importance of AI governance for boards, emphasizing the need for rigorous AI risk assessments, audits, and assurances to ensure responsible AI practices across organizations. It highlights the emerging professional standards for AI assurance, drawing parallels to established financial auditing methods to build credibility and accountability in AI systems.
On March 20, 2026, the White House unveiled its National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence, outlining legislative recommendations to guide AI governance and secure U.S. leadership in the global AI landscape. The framework emphasizes child safety, intellectual property rights, and innovation while advocating for a unified federal approach to prevent state-level regulatory fragmentation.
The General Services Administration (GSA) has proposed a new AI clause, GSAR 552.239-7001, aimed at imposing specific safeguarding requirements for artificial intelligence systems in federal contracts. The deadline for comments on this proposed clause has been extended to April 3, 2026, allowing stakeholders to provide feedback on its implications and requirements.
On February 25, 2026, the European Parliament’s Committee on Legal Affairs adopted a report addressing the intersection of generative artificial intelligence and copyright law, highlighting the need for a legal framework to protect creators’ rights while promoting AI development. The report emphasizes the urgency of addressing legal uncertainties surrounding copyright use in AI training and calls for transparency measures and fair remuneration for creators.
Oregon lawmakers have advanced Senate Bill 1546, which would impose safety, disclosure, and liability requirements on AI chatbot providers. If signed by the governor, the law will create legal exposure for chatbot interactions and require operators to disclose AI use while implementing safety protocols and intervention measures for high-risk scenarios.
The UK Government recently published a report assessing the relationship between copyright and AI, emphasizing the need for further evidence before making any legislative changes. While the report highlights the importance of transparency and potential licensing models, it does not propose immediate reforms to existing copyright laws.
The Trump administration has proposed a national AI policy framework that emphasizes uniformity across states to foster innovation and protect citizens. The framework aims to prioritize child safety, free speech, and economic growth while addressing potential regulatory challenges and risks associated with AI technology.
Washington has introduced competing AI policy frameworks, signaling a pivotal phase in federal AI legislation. The White House’s National AI Policy Framework advocates for children’s safety, copyright protections, and a light regulatory approach while Sen. Marsha Blackburn’s TRUMP AMERICA AI Act proposes a broader regulatory structure.
The integration of artificial intelligence in modern warfare is reshaping the dynamics of conflict, as seen in recent events like the Russia-Ukraine war and the U.S.-Israel confrontations. This shift towards AI-enabled operations raises critical issues of governance and the need for human oversight in military decision-making.