Senator Ted Cruz has introduced a new AI regulation proposal called the Sandbox Act, which allows developers to test and launch AI technologies without federal oversight. The bill aims to promote American innovation while addressing public safety and ethical considerations.
The EU’s AI Act emphasizes that risk governance, transparency, and accountability are essential for compliance. As organizations explore the potential of Agentic AI, they must adapt their compliance strategies to address the complexities and risks introduced by these autonomous systems.
This guide outlines how to effectively assess the risks associated with artificial intelligence (AI) systems through an Artificial Intelligence Impact Assessment (AIIA). It emphasizes the importance of creating a repeatable framework that addresses potential biases, privacy concerns, and the broader societal impacts of AI technologies.
The EU AI Act not only targets big tech companies but also holds governments accountable as risk owners of AI systems. Public institutions must comply with strict obligations when deploying AI, ensuring transparency and risk management in their operations.
California has passed SB 53, a bill requiring transparency reports from developers of powerful AI models to address catastrophic risks such as AI-enabled biological weapons attacks. The bill aims to hold AI companies accountable for safety commitments and prevent potential disasters before they occur.
California’s Assembly Bill 1018, which aims to require transparency and the right to appeal automated decisions affecting individuals, has been delayed for the third consecutive year. The decision allows for further discussions with Governor Gavin Newsom and addresses concerns raised by various industry opponents.
The EU AI Act, launching in August 2025, establishes a comprehensive legal framework for ethical AI development worldwide, categorizing AI by risk and imposing strict documentation and governance requirements, particularly for General-Purpose AI models. Non-compliance can lead to substantial fines, making it a pivotal regulation for AI developers globally.
AI will not eliminate legal jobs in Brazil by 2025, but it will automate routine tasks like research and drafting, potentially affecting 31.3 million workers. As demand rises for expertise in areas such as LGPD compliance and liability, targeted reskilling will be crucial for legal professionals.
The debate over whether Congress should preempt state-level AI laws has intensified, with proponents arguing that conflicting regulations could hinder innovation. Historical lessons suggest that Congress typically intervenes to ensure uniformity and leverage federal expertise when managing emerging technologies.
The EU AI Act is now in effect, presenting multifaceted risks for legal leaders, including potential fines and reputational damage. To mitigate these risks, it’s crucial for General Counsel and Chief Legal Officers to ask their legal tech vendors seven key questions regarding compliance and governance.