Finland’s government is preparing for the implementation of the EU AI Act, which mandates compliance with general-purpose AI obligations starting August 2, 2025. This guide outlines the legal and practical steps needed for Finnish agencies to effectively utilize AI while ensuring transparency, human oversight, and adherence to new regulations.
As AI becomes a defining force in global innovation, South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan are establishing distinct regulatory frameworks to oversee its use, each aiming for more innovation-friendly regimes. South Korea’s AI Basic Act emphasizes a risk-based approach, while Japan’s AI Promotion Act focuses on stimulating innovation through a lighter regulatory touch.
As insurance companies increasingly integrate AI into their processes, they face regulatory scrutiny and ethical challenges that necessitate transparency and fairness. New regulations aim to minimize risks of unfair discrimination while ensuring accountability in the use of intelligent systems.
The European Commission’s final draft of the General-Purpose Artificial Intelligence (GPAI) Code of Practice has sparked discussions about its implications for AI regulation, revealing an epistemic gap in how “general-purpose AI” is defined. The EU AI Act’s rigid legal constructs may hinder adaptive governance in a rapidly evolving technological landscape, emphasizing the need for anticipatory frameworks that embrace uncertainty and flexibility.