The development of technical standards for the EU’s AI Act is behind schedule, with completion now expected to extend into 2026. This delay may impact manufacturers’ ability to demonstrate compliance with the regulations aimed at ensuring the safety and trustworthiness of high-risk AI applications.
The U.K. has paused its efforts on artificial intelligence (AI) regulation, caught between the deregulation approach of the U.S. and the stringent AI Act of the E.U. This delay raises concerns for organizations seeking clarity and consistency in the evolving landscape of AI governance.
The article discusses the European Union’s shift towards regulatory simplification in the tech sector, warning that this could lead to a compromise on transparency and accountability in AI development. It argues that robust transparency standards are essential for fostering innovation and competition, and cautions against viewing transparency as an obstacle to progress.
As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly integrated into daily life, Congress and the courts are grappling with the legal implications of its use, particularly concerning issues like deepfakes and copyright infringement. Recent legislative efforts, such as the Take It Down Act, aim to address the exploitation of AI technologies while balancing the need for free speech and privacy rights.
The EU AI Act aims to be the first significant regulation focused on artificial intelligence, ensuring that AI systems in Europe are safe and fair. As the implementation timeline progresses, companies, especially startups, face challenges in complying with the evolving technical standards required by the Act.
The EU AI Act aims to be the first significant regulation focused on artificial intelligence, ensuring that AI systems in Europe are safe and fair. As the implementation timeline progresses, companies, especially startups, face challenges in complying with the evolving technical standards required by the Act.
Policy experts warn that restricting AI training on copyrighted materials in the UK could lead to biased models and minimal compensation for creators. They argue that current copyright proposals overlook the broader economic impacts and may hinder innovation across multiple sectors.
The emergence of the Chinese AI app DeepSeek is prompting EU policymakers to consider amendments to the EU AI Act, particularly regarding the threshold measures of computing power for general-purpose AI models. This could significantly impact how various GPAI models are regulated, especially those classified as having ‘systemic risk’.
The article discusses the varying approaches to regulating AI development across different countries, highlighting the differences between the United States, European Union, and the United Kingdom. It emphasizes the need for international cooperation to establish baseline standards that address key AI-related risks while fostering innovation.
This article discusses how Data Engineering teams can transform from being bottlenecks to strategic enablers of AI by implementing collaborative frameworks and governance. By fostering partnerships with business units, DE teams empower organizations to build trustworthy and scalable AI solutions efficiently.
Take the first steps in your transformation towards international AI compliance.
Our expert sales team is here to answer your questions, just leave your email and we’ll get in touch.
